Wazuh
Zabbix
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer
Beats
rsyslog
Sematext Logagent
Fluentd
Syslog-ng
WireGuard
OpenVPN
ZeroTier
ProtonVPN
Hamachi
Tunnelblick
Psiphon
Tor Browser
WireGuardBased on our record, Wazuh should be more popular than WireGuard. It has been mentiond 49 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
I use Wazuh instead. Greenbone CE is severely limited and requires payment for anything beyond the very basic. Super simple installation more features. Source: 5 months ago
Monitoring & Active Measures - Exporting firewall events to an external time-series database like I describe above is good to see who is touching your firewall or accessing your web site. Using an Intrusion Detection System / Intrusion Prevention System (IDS/IPS) such as open-source Suricata, which is a free package on pfSense, and deploying file system integrity monitoring, such as the open-source Wazuh on the... Source: 6 months ago
Wazuh: An open source security monitoring platform that integrates with popular tools like Elasticsearch and Kibana to provide comprehensive security event analysis and response capabilities. - Source: dev.to / 12 months ago
On another note, as mentioned in my response to the question of this post, we are working on a complete rework of the Vulnerability Detection engine. This rework will provide a sanitized CVEs feed from wazuh.com and a completely new scanner engine. It will also include a new UI for global queries. Source: 12 months ago
Nessus essentials (https://www.tenable.com/products/nessus/nessus-essentials) might do the trick. It can help to check what kind of services you are running are vulnerable to exploits. Also, the general recommendation here would be not to use default ports for all the services you are exposing. Also, you can check something like Wazuh - https://wazuh.com/. Source: 12 months ago
Wireguard. Wireguard uses UDP only and runs TCP sockets over UDP. Source: about 1 year ago
Look at Wireguard. I know you don't want Yet Another VPN running alongside your IPSec, but it's less VPN and more encrypted point-to-point UDP. You can set it up on any port you wish, including common ports that might be open on an outbound smart firewall not doing deep packet inspection. That way, it can stay out of the way of your existing IPSec deployment. Source: about 1 year ago
We use Elixir/Erlang for our control plane, and Rust for our data plane, built on the excellent WireGuard® tunneling protocol. Source: about 1 year ago
Both products are based off Wireguard which is available for all new linux distributions. https://wireguard.com . I'm not saying OP's solution is wrong, just curious what the advantages are. Other than potentially simpler client setup, what are the advantages of paying for tailscale. With the opensource tailscale, I'm not sure if you get access to an api you can use to look up the hosts. Source: about 1 year ago
Noise Protocol Framework (used by Wireguard). Source: about 1 year ago
Zabbix - Track, record, alert and visualize performance and availability of IT resources
OpenVPN - OpenVPN - The Open Source VPN
Fortinet FortiAnalyzer - Fortinet FortiAnalyzer is a powerful product for Security Fabric Analytics and Automation.
ZeroTier - Extremely simple P2P Encrypted VPN
Beats - Beats is the platform for single-purpose data shippers that is installed as lightweight agents and send data to machines to Logstash or Elasticsearch.
ProtonVPN - ProtonVPN is a security focused FREE VPN service, developed by CERN and MIT scientists. Use the web anonymously, unblock websites & encrypt your connection.