Wazuh VS KeePass

Wazuh Reviews

KeePass Reviews

Wazuh mentions (49)

• Greenbone

  I use Wazuh instead. Greenbone CE is severely limited and requires payment for anything beyond the very basic. Super simple installation more features. Source: 5 months ago

• Risks of hosting a website out of my house

  Monitoring & Active Measures - Exporting firewall events to an external time-series database like I describe above is good to see who is touching your firewall or accessing your web site. Using an Intrusion Detection System / Intrusion Prevention System (IDS/IPS) such as open-source Suricata, which is a free package on pfSense, and deploying file system integrity monitoring, such as the open-source Wazuh on the... Source: 6 months ago

• DevOps and Security: DevSecOps

  Wazuh: An open source security monitoring platform that integrates with popular tools like Elasticsearch and Kibana to provide comprehensive security event analysis and response capabilities. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

• Vulnerability overview

  On another note, as mentioned in my response to the question of this post, we are working on a complete rework of the Vulnerability Detection engine. This rework will provide a sanitized CVEs feed from wazuh.com and a completely new scanner engine. It will also include a new UI for global queries. Source: about 1 year ago

• Homelab security advice

  Nessus essentials (https://www.tenable.com/products/nessus/nessus-essentials) might do the trick. It can help to check what kind of services you are running are vulnerable to exploits. Also, the general recommendation here would be not to use default ports for all the services you are exposing. Also, you can check something like Wazuh - https://wazuh.com/. Source: about 1 year ago

KeePass mentions (206)

• Ask HN: Why do people use Password Managers?

  And the best part is there are solutions already that do this: https://keepass.info/ Does it work on Android or iOS? - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago

• Ask HN: Why do people use Password Managers?

  The key difference here being that this is two way hashing so passwords can be decrypted. In reality, there are a lot of attack vectors like MITM, event logging or sometimes straight up storing data in plaintext. Through these hackers can generally get passwords of all users of these services. So, why don't people use local password managers? Just a txt file encrypted with "master password" should be pretty... - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago

• Google-hosted malvertising leads to fake Keepass site that looks genuine

  When you're at a point where you're relying on a display name to make security-critical decisions, you've already lost. Character substitutions like ķeepass or ƙeepass or keypass are at least possible to spot if you know the name of the product, but not the full URL. But there are many ways to create lookalike domains that don't change the product name: https://keepass.org https://keepass.net https://keepass.info... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

• Google announces passwordless by default: Make the switch to passkeys

  > People love to hate on passwords but the reality is that for many circumstances (threat models) they are the best compromise. You can make them more than strong enough (take 32+ bytes out of /dev/random and encode however you like, nobody will ever brute force that in this universe) and various passwords managers solve the problem of re-use (never reuse a password). > And it comes with the benefit that you... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

• If you cannot download any books, then you’re on one of the scam sites

  If you have used this combo at many sites (which is of course not recommended) then download one of the available free Password Managers like Keepass, Bitwarden, Lastpass or any others you can find with a Google Search. Source: 7 months ago