Software Alternatives & Reviews

Wasabi VS Azure Archive Storage

Compare Wasabi VS Azure Archive Storage and see what are their differences

Wasabi logo Wasabi

Storage made simple. Faster than Amazon's S3. Less expensive than Glacier.

Azure Archive Storage logo Azure Archive Storage

Low cost, secure cloud storage for rarely accessed data.
  • Wasabi Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-22
  • Azure Archive Storage Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-11

Wasabi videos

Introduction to Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage

More videos:

  • Review - Introduction to Wasabi Hot Cloud Storage (August 2021) | Wasabi

Azure Archive Storage videos

No Azure Archive Storage videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Wasabi and Azure Archive Storage)
Cloud Storage
86 86%
14% 14
Cloud Computing
92 92%
8% 8
File Sharing
72 72%
28% 28
Monitoring Tools
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Wasabi and Azure Archive Storage. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Wasabi and Azure Archive Storage

Wasabi Reviews

Wasabi, Storj, Backblaze et al, are promising 80%+ savings compared to Amazon S3... What's the catch?
On the surface, Wasabi looks appealing with a simple pricing structure ($5.99/TB/mo) that comes with free egress and free operations. How can Wasabi afford this, you ask? Well, their business model relies on their user-base keeping their data stored (and unchanged) for some time and not consuming more than their fair share of resources, which they regulate via a handful of...
Source: dev.to

Azure Archive Storage Reviews

We have no reviews of Azure Archive Storage yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Wasabi seems to be a lot more popular than Azure Archive Storage. While we know about 69 links to Wasabi, we've tracked only 3 mentions of Azure Archive Storage. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Wasabi mentions (69)

  • How much 1 TB of egress costs by cloud provider
    This table is missing Wasabi [0], which has free egress. [0]: https://wasabi.com. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago
  • What makes backblaze better than some of the other options out there?
    Backblaze is great because it's a set price, unlimited, and I don't have to think twice about it. I use Arq to backup my machine + external drives (several drives with lots of photos) to my local NAS. Was sending data to Wasabi, but the costs got out of control. I can purchase a year's worth of Backblaze + the 1 year revision upgrade for much, much less of what I was paying at Wasabi. Source: 11 months ago
  • The NixOS Foundation’s Call to Action: S3 Costs Require Community Support
    What about looking at Wasabi? It’s $5.99 per TB per month https://wasabi.com. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago
  • A web application that will need to store lots of image files. The company wants to use Dropbox for image storage. Is this okay?
    No, use AWS S3 or https://wasabi.com/ if you are worried about cost. Source: 11 months ago
  • Veeam backing up to google drive - NOT GCP - is it possible?
    I would suggest that you take a look at Wasabi. They're one of the most used object storage providers with Veeam, offer great performance and cost 5.99$ per TB. Https://wasabi.com/. Source: 12 months ago
View more

Azure Archive Storage mentions (3)

  • best practice and cheapest way to store or archive big amounts of data
    This! Glacier is very cheap and is a great option to store archival data. OP should be aware that it would take a while to retrieve data if needed. As mentioned, Azure Archive Storage is a nice option as well. https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/products/storage/. Source: over 1 year ago
  • Best cloud storage for reasonable price
    Cheaper than that would be Azure Archive or AWS Glacier since their storage costs $0.00099 per month for 1GB, but it takes a while to retrieve data back. If you need a long-term archival for cheap, their archive storage is worth your considerations. Https://azure.microsoft.com/en-us/services/storage/archive/ Https://aws.amazon.com/glacier/. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Top 30 Microsoft Azure Services
    If you're deploying applications to the cloud, you'll need persistent data storage. Azure Blob Storage allows scalable storage for objects and files and provides an SDK to easily access them. Blob storage is a great trigger for Azure Functions, where uploading a file can automatically run your custom logic in the cloud (for example, if you wanted to run OCR on a file as soon as it's uploaded to a storage... - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Wasabi and Azure Archive Storage, you can also consider the following products

Amazon S3 - Amazon S3 is an object storage where users can store data from their business on a safe, cloud-based platform. Amazon S3 operates in 54 availability zones within 18 graphic regions and 1 local region.

Mimecast Cloud Archive - Reduce costs with Mimecast's cloud archive to move to the cloud with a single, secure archive for email, files and other content.

Backblaze - Backblaze's remote backup automatically backs up your data to our secure datacenter.

Amazon Glacier - Amazon Glacier is a secure, durable, and extremely low-cost storage service for data archiving and long-term backup.

Google Cloud Storage - Google Cloud Storage offers developers and IT organizations durable and highly available object storage.

Public Cloud Archive - Learn about cloud archiving, the difference between hybrid and full-service cloud archive offerings, and the key cloud archive vendors and offerings in the market today.