Walls.io VS cpulimit

Walls.io Reviews

1. John    

   over 2 years ago
   We use this social media aggregator at all our public and private events

   We lately used it at a job fair and it was a huge draw. We also use it on an ongoing basis to show our social media presence quickly without having to pull up the individual platforms. All in all, I found it the quickest way to present what I wanted to a variety of audiences. It's a great social media engagement tool.

   👍 Pros:    The look is very slick, dynamic and clean. it is simple to set up. it can be adjusted regularly to vary the theme and add variety. it allows our employees and others who are not on social media to experience our organization's social media presence.|Their moderation options are more advanced compared to other tools i tried.|Our users loved the real time content updates. this is also something i haven't found for the same price in the other tools i tested.|Great customer service.

   👎 Cons:    We just loved it, no cons. we plan to use walls.io for future events as well.
2. Guest    

   over 2 years ago
   We can engage our students, instructors and staff from multiple locations.

   I like that we can curate content using both a hashtag and a social feed. Being able to combine content from more than one place keeps content fresh, and use of a hashtag makes posting easy for end-users.

   👍 Pros:    It has very advanced moderation features. this was one of the main reasons we chose it.|The content updates almost in real time and that's magical during events.|The support team goes out of their way trying to help.

   👎 Cons:    It would be great to be able to easily add extra walls to the entry plan.

cpulimit Reviews

Walls.io mentions (1)

• Tools for Mastodon

  Awesome thing! We're adding Mastodon support to https://walls.io/ next week - will allow you to track hashtags and create a Mastodon social wall content feed to embed as widget on your website or run on a screen/display! Source: over 1 year ago

cpulimit mentions (4)

• Starfield occasionally freezes in a CPU limited PC. I managed to solve it on W10, some help on Linux?

  I even tried using Cpulimit to try limiting it to 90%. Idk, the program tells to set a number from 0 to 400 which would be the percentage of the cpu and since mine has 4c/4t i´ve ran with 360, which managed to limit around 90%. Also, i´ve tried using 90 as argument and CPU was limited aroud 20% to 25% of usage, so I think I use it right. Source: 8 months ago

• cpulimit annoyed me so I improved it

  A few days ago I discovered cpulimit. It's a great tool that nicely (haha) complements nice. Where nice is normally used to reduce the amount of CPU a process uses by changing it priority, a niced process can still end up using more CPU than you want, and will of course use all that it wants if nothing with a higher priority comes along. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago

• Test Your Product on a Crappy Laptop

  Thanks for your elaborate notes! This is helpful information. When I tried your commands, on Arch via libcgroup-git, `cgcreate -g cpu:cpulimit` only results in `cgcreate: can't create cgroup cpulimit: Cgroup, requested group parameter does not exist`, for some reason. But this is not a support ticket, I have not researched this at all yet. But cgroups only limit some processes anyway, never the entire... - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

• Run background processes at 1fps

  A bit different from what you're asking but for this kind of use, I generally use cpulimit (link). It allows you to artificially limit the amount of CPU consumed by a process. Source: over 2 years ago