Walk Score VS Homesnap

I would look on realtor.ca or an easier user interface would be condos.ca. Then look at walkscore.com at that point if you don't see a match for price and size to amenity, you'll know what the landscape is best. Source: 10 months ago

It depends on what neighborhood. If you're just going off of walkscore.com, etc, even though the city itself only gets a 56, many neighborhood are in the mid-high 80s. (East hills, Eastown, Midtown, etc). Source: 11 months ago

Perhaps look at walkscore.com also to assess the areas you are considering. Source: about 1 year ago

Keep in mind that those top 10 types of lists are driven by advertisers and are highly subjective. If finances are a consideration, there are MANY very walkable neighborhoods that are far lower cost of living. Use walkscore.com as a starting point. Source: about 1 year ago

Not owning a car really helped me save enough to buy a house in an old streetcar district. The weather is (usually) great so most trips are made via transit or bike. We're still car-free in our mid-50s. Try walkscore.com to find neighborhoods over 80. Ours gets a 91. Source: about 1 year ago

Blaming it on Californians is a false right-wing shibboleth; they're short too. For example, at the moment, Sunnyvale CA, population 150K in the heart of Silicon Valley, has a whopping 56 houses and townhouses for sale, about half per-capita of ABQ's 349 (source: realtor.com, filtered for non-pending). Most of the people who "fled" the Bay Area just moved to the outer suburbs. Source: about 3 years ago