WakaTime VS Coveralls

Wakatime.com — Quantified self-metrics about your coding activity using text editor plugins, limited plan for free. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago

Hi Hackers, One year ago I posted[0] on HN[1] about writing my own replacement for Celery, a background task queue for Python. WakaQ has been running in production[2] for over a year, and it's performed flawlessly. I've even been able to reduce the amount of worker machines needed, saving compute costs, even though the number of tasks executed has increased over time. Now I'm starting a new Next.js project using... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

WakaTime is committed to making time tracking fully automatic for every programmer. By creating opensource plugins for IDEs and text editors, it gives powerful insights about how you code. It is possible now demonstrate these statistics in your GitHub profile. What’s next? Next up, showcase your skills, awards, and certifications. - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago

Building a daily habit to learn or code is essential. In a while, you don’t ask yourself what to do in the next 30 minutes you have. You open the terminal / IDE and practice. I used WakaTime to track my coding time and set a goal of one hour daily. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago

Why do they all redirect to https://wakatime.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago

Cpan_coverage: This calculates the coverage of your test suite and reports the results. It also uploads the results to coveralls.io. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago

I will normally use GitHub Actions to automatically run my test suite on each push, on every major version of Perl I support. One of the test runs will load Devel::Cover and use it to upload test coverage data to Codecov and Coveralls. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

Coveralls.io — Display test coverage reports, free for Open Source. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

Several years ago I got into Travis CI and set up lots of my GitHub repos so they automatically ran the tests each time I committed to the repo. Later on, I also worked out how to tie those test runs into Coveralls.io so I got pretty graphs of how my test coverage was looking. I gave a talk about what I had done. - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago

This approach will create two json coverage files, which will be merged together by NYC. Therefore the results will be purely local. If You don't mind using online tools like Codecov or Coveralls for merging data from different tests, then go ahead and use them. They will probably also be more accurate. But if You still want to learn how to get coverage from E2E, then please read through. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago