Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

W3C Mobile Checker VS puppeteer

Compare W3C Mobile Checker VS puppeteer and see what are their differences

DocRaptor
As the only API powered by the Prince HTML-to-PDF engine, DocRaptor provides the best support for complex PDFs with powerful support for headers, page breaks, page numbers, flexbox, watermarks, accessible PDFs, and much more featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

W3C Mobile Checker logo W3C Mobile Checker

Make websites work better on mobile devices

puppeteer logo puppeteer

Puppeteer is a Node library which provides a high-level API to control headless Chrome or Chromium...
  • W3C Mobile Checker Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-02-28
  • puppeteer Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-02

W3C Mobile Checker features and specs

  • Standard Compliance
    W3C Mobile Checker helps ensure that web pages comply with web standards and best practices set by the World Wide Web Consortium. This is crucial for maintaining consistency and accessibility across different devices.
  • Mobile Compatibility
    It specifically focuses on checking the mobile-responsiveness of a website, which is increasingly important as more users access the web from mobile devices.
  • Error Identification
    The tool identifies issues related to mobile design and functionality, allowing developers to fix problems that might hinder the mobile user experience.
  • Improved SEO
    By ensuring mobile compatibility, the W3C Mobile Checker can indirectly contribute to better search engine optimization, since mobile-friendliness is a ranking factor for search engines.
  • Free and Open Access
    Being a tool developed by W3C, it is freely accessible online, making it easy for developers to use without any cost barriers.

Possible disadvantages of W3C Mobile Checker

  • Limited to Mobile Checks
    While focused on mobile compatibility, it does not provide comprehensive validation for other aspects of a website, such as desktop compatibility or performance.
  • Alpha Release
    Being an 'alpha' version, it may have incomplete features or bugs, potentially leading to inaccurate validation results or a less polished user experience.
  • Technical Knowledge Requirement
    Developers need some level of technical understanding to interpret the results and implement recommended changes, which can be challenging for beginners.
  • No Direct Fix Suggestions
    While it identifies issues, the tool may not provide detailed suggestions or solutions on how to fix the identified problems, requiring additional research or expertise from the user.
  • Outdated Information
    Web technologies and standards evolve quickly, and as an alpha version, there's a risk that some checks might be based on outdated standards or practices.

puppeteer features and specs

  • Headless Browsing
    Puppeteer allows headless browsing, which means you can automate and test web applications without opening a browser user interface, resulting in faster execution and lower resource usage.
  • Full Browser Control
    Enables full control over Chrome or Chromium browsers, allowing for comprehensive browser testing and automation, including taking screenshots, generating PDFs, and capturing web pages.
  • Rich API
    Offers a rich set of APIs that can control browsers, manage cookies, intercept network requests, and handle various browser events, making it versatile for different use cases.
  • Active Community
    Highly active open-source community with regular updates and a plethora of plugins and extensions, providing robust support and continuous improvements.
  • Compatibility
    Supports the latest JavaScript features and works seamlessly with popular libraries and frameworks, providing a modern development experience.

Possible disadvantages of puppeteer

  • Restricted to Chrome/Chromium
    Puppeteer is primarily designed to work with Chrome and Chromium browsers, limiting cross-browser testing capabilities compared to other tools that support multiple browsers.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running multiple instances of headless browsers can be resource-intensive in terms of CPU and memory usage, potentially affecting performance on limited hardware.
  • Learning Curve
    Requires some learning curve for developers unfamiliar with browser automation or the Puppeteer API, making initial setup and usage potentially time-consuming.
  • Lacks JavaScript Redaction
    Unlike some other tools, Puppeteer does not natively support JavaScript error redaction, which means developers must manage error handling and debugging themselves.
  • Not Ideal for GUI Tests
    Since Puppeteer is headless by default, it might not be ideal for GUI end-to-end tests that require visual validation, requiring additional tools or configurations to enable full browser displays.

Analysis of puppeteer

Overall verdict

  • Puppeteer is considered a strong choice for developers seeking a robust and efficient way to automate browser tasks. It is particularly favored in situations where headless browser actions are required due to its rich feature set and its solid support from both the community and its active development team. However, it may not be the best choice for those looking for cross-browser testing since it focuses specifically on Chrome or Chromium.

Why this product is good

  • Puppeteer is a Node.js library that provides a high-level API to control headless Chrome or Chromium browsers. It is widely appreciated for its speed, reliability, and comprehensive feature set that makes it easy to automate tasks like web scraping, automated testing, and taking screenshots. Users benefit from the ability to programmatically control browser actions, which can be useful for testing user interactions and rendering dynamic content.

Recommended for

  • Web scraping projects that need to render dynamic web pages or deal with JavaScript-heavy sites.
  • Automated testing scenarios that involve simulating user interactions and verifying UI changes.
  • Performance analysis and monitoring of JavaScript execution in a controlled environment.
  • Developers who need to generate PDFs or capture screenshots from web pages programmatically.

W3C Mobile Checker videos

No W3C Mobile Checker videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

puppeteer videos

+ Add

Puppeteer - Video Review

More videos:

  • Review - GameSpot Reviews - Puppeteer
  • Review - CGR Undertow - PUPPETEER review for PlayStation 3

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to W3C Mobile Checker and puppeteer)

W3C Mobile Checker

puppeteer

Website Builder
100 100%
Website Builder
0% 0
Automated Testing
0 0%
Automated Testing
100% 100
CMS
100 100%
CMS
0% 0
Browser Testing
0 0%
Browser Testing
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using W3C Mobile Checker and puppeteer. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare W3C Mobile Checker and puppeteer

W3C Mobile Checker Reviews

We have no reviews of W3C Mobile Checker yet.
Be the first one to post

puppeteer Reviews

Top Selenium Alternatives
Puppeteer offers more direct and tighter integration with Chrome or Chromium through the DevTools Protocol, unlike Selenium which abstracts the browser interaction through WebDriver, making it more versatile across different browsers but potentially less optimized for specific browser internals like those Puppeteer accesses in Chrome.
Source: bugbug.io
Best Data Scraping Tools
It is completely free. Puppeteer is well backed and supported by Google Chrome and hence replacing Selenium and PhantomJS. It automatically installs an efficient, compatible Chromium binary in its setup, therefore reducing the burden of keeping track on your browser.
Source: pamelaewallaceu.medium.com
Puppeteer vs Selenium
If you're looking for a better alternative, try Endtest. It has Puppeteer's speed, it supports Selenium's browsers AND it has all the features that they're missing.
Source: dev.to
Introduction to Headless Browser Testing
The Puppeteer API can be used to take screenshots, create PDFs, navigate pages, and fetch information from pages. We’ll write some example code to see Puppeteer in action.
Source: blog.logrocket.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, puppeteer seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 106 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

W3C Mobile Checker mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of W3C Mobile Checker yet. Tracking of W3C Mobile Checker recommendations started around Mar 2021.

puppeteer mentions (106)

  • Top React Testing Libraries in 2025
    Puppeteer is a headless browser automation tool built on Chromium. It allows developers to simulate user interactions, capture screenshots, and perform UI tests with a high degree of accuracy. Puppeteer is particularly useful for testing cross-browser compatibility and visual elements in React applications. Its robust API enables precise control over browser actions, making it a valuable tool for UI testing and... - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • End-to-End SEO Testing with Playwright and Lighthouse
    Vitest is a next-generation JavaScript testing framework powered by Vite. It’s an excellent alternative to Jest, offering native TypeScript support, a fast setup, and solid performance. However, while it has an experimental headless browser, it’s not ideal for advanced scenarios like running SEO audits in CI/CD pipelines. Instead, we can pair Vitest with Pupetter, a more mature tool for headless browser automation. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • The Puppeteer Language Experiment
    This project tests how the browser language can be changed with Puppeteer. It implements multiple options to set the language of Chrome and checks each option against BrowserLeaks to see how it affected the JavaScript proeprties and HTTP headers available by the browser. For more information, see my article The Puppeteer Language Experiment on DEV.to. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Scrapy Vs. Crawlee
    In Crawlee, you can scrape JavaScript rendered websites using the built-in headless Puppeteer and Playwright browsers. It is important to note that, by default, Crawlee scrapes in headless mode. If you don't want headless, then just set headless: false. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Sometimes things simply don't work
    I am not in any way associated with the developers at puppeteer, but if you are looking for a way to contribute, they are open source. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing W3C Mobile Checker and puppeteer, you can also consider the following products

Dimensions Toolkit - Chrome Extension for designers to test responsive websites.

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

Flexbox Grid - Grid based on CSS3 flexbox

Cypress.io - Slow, difficult and unreliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Install Cypress in seconds and take the pain out of front-end testing.

One Click Test - Tool for quickly testing your design layout in one click.

Playwright - Playwright is automation software for Chromium, Firefox, Webkit using the Node.js library having a single API in place.

Loading...