VirtualDJ VS AdoptOpenJDK

To "live DJ" there's the extremely famous https://virtualdj.com/ To create prerecorded DJ sets https://www.mixmeister.com/ Been using both for at least 10 years, love them both. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

Not open source, but free for "home use" https://virtualdj.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

I started with Virtual DJ to get used to the software latency (I came from turntables) and get my muscle memory on button locations (which is why I stayed with the same brand). VDJ has every feature you need. The software is free to use without a controller from virtualdj.com. Source: over 1 year ago

A lot of the places that do it from scratch I notice use https://virtualdj.com/. Source: over 1 year ago

DJ software, like VirtualDJ will have features that are more conducive to what you're trying to do, like live looping functions that help you lock the loop to the beat. It's also cheaper (free for non-commercial use without a hardware controller) than QLab, and it's cross-platform (QLab is Mac-only, if that matters). Source: almost 2 years ago

I'd check out an opens source JRE like https://adoptopenjdk.net/ and compare your workloads there against the Oracle ones if possible. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

Oracle still releases the OpenJDK code under an open source license, and that will work without the strings. AdoptOpenJDK has Windows binaries if that's the platform you are on. You can even install directly with Ninite. Cheers. Source: over 1 year ago

Use something like https://openjdk.org/ or https://adoptopenjdk.net/. Source: over 1 year ago

And I did mispeak it us 1.11, as that was the latest version with LTS on AdoptOpenJDK at the time it was implemented. I think it was talked down from 16, since it had no LTS. Source: over 1 year ago

Use one of the several free distributions like OpenJDK and you won't have to worry about Oracle licensing. They are virtually the same except a few tools you probably don't use anyway. Source: over 1 year ago