Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

UX Archive Animated VS Three.js

Compare UX Archive Animated VS Three.js and see what are their differences

Zoviz
Zoviz: Professional Logos, Perfectly Personalized Your Brand. Your Story featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

UX Archive Animated logo UX Archive Animated

iOS apps animated user flows

Three.js logo Three.js

A JavaScript 3D library which makes WebGL simpler.
  • UX Archive Animated Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-22
  • Three.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-05-05

UX Archive Animated features and specs

  • Comprehensive Collection
    UX Archive Animated offers a wide range of well-documented user interactions from popular mobile apps, making it a valuable resource for UX professionals seeking inspiration or reference.
  • Visual Clarity
    The site provides clean and clear animations that help users understand the flow of interactions within an app, which is especially useful for practitioners who need to visualize complex processes.
  • Categorization
    Interactions are well-categorized by types such as 'onboarding,' 'search,' 'checkout,' etc., which makes it easier for users to find specific examples relevant to their current project needs.
  • High-Quality Content
    Each interaction example is carefully selected and usually represents high-quality user experience practices, serving as good benchmarks for design.
  • Frequent Updates
    The platform is regularly updated with new interactions from newly popular apps, ensuring that the content remains fresh and relevant.

Possible disadvantages of UX Archive Animated

  • Limited Interactivity
    While UX Archive Animated offers good visual representations, the limited interactivity of these animations may not provide a fully immersive experience for users trying to understand micro-interactions.
  • Subscription Model
    Some valuable features and full access to the archive require a subscription, which might be a barrier for casual users or those with limited budgets.
  • Focus on Mobile
    The archive primarily focuses on mobile app interactions, potentially leaving out a rich array of web UX examples that could be equally valuable to designers.
  • Lack of Depth in Analysis
    While the animations are visually informative, they often lack detailed explanations or context about why certain UX decisions were made, which can limit their educational value.
  • Search Functionality
    The search functionality could be more advanced, as sometimes it can be challenging to find specific interactions unless they are among the most common categories.

Three.js features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Three.js simplifies the complex task of 3D rendering with an intuitive API, making it accessible to developers who may not have deep expertise in 3D graphics.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    Three.js is built upon WebGL, ensuring compatibility across modern browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge.
  • Comprehensive Documentation
    The library offers extensive documentation, examples, and an active community, which helps in quickly resolving issues and understanding implementation.
  • Integration with HTML and CSS
    Three.js can be easily integrated with HTML and CSS, allowing for the blending of 2D and 3D elements in web applications.
  • Extensive Features
    It supports a wide range of features including cameras, lights, materials, shaders, and post-processing effects, making it highly versatile for various 3D projects.

Possible disadvantages of Three.js

  • Performance Overhead
    Despite its powerful capabilities, Three.js can have significant performance overhead, especially for complex scenes, which might require optimization.
  • Learning Curve
    While easier than raw WebGL, Three.js still has a learning curve, particularly for those new to 3D graphics, requiring time to become proficient.
  • Limited Built-in Advanced Tools
    Although feature-rich, Three.js lacks some advanced tools out-of-the-box compared to more specialized or industry-standard 3D engines, necessitating custom solutions for certain tasks.
  • Dependency on WebGL
    Three.js relies on WebGL, meaning it cannot be used in environments where WebGL is not supported, which can limit accessibility and compatibility.
  • Frequent Updates
    The library is actively developed, which is generally positive, but frequent updates can mean breaking changes, requiring developers to frequently refactor their code.

Analysis of UX Archive Animated

Overall verdict

  • Yes, UX Archive Animated is considered a good resource for design professionals and enthusiasts interested in the intricacies of UI/UX design, especially in the context of mobile apps.

Why this product is good

  • UX Archive Animated is well-regarded because it provides a comprehensive collection of user interface animations from a wide range of mobile applications. It is a valuable resource for designers looking to study and draw inspiration from real-world examples of animations and transitions.

Recommended for

    This resource is recommended for UX/UI designers, design students, product managers, and anyone interested in understanding and improving mobile app user experiences through animation.

UX Archive Animated videos

No UX Archive Animated videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Three.js videos

+ Add

Getting Started With Three.js

More videos:

  • Review - Ricardo Cabello (Mr doob) - 5 years of three.js

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to UX Archive Animated and Three.js)

UX Archive Animated

Three.js

Design Tools
100 100%
Design Tools
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
0 0%
Javascript UI Libraries
100% 100
Web App
100 100%
Web App
0% 0
Flowcharts
0 0%
Flowcharts
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using UX Archive Animated and Three.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare UX Archive Animated and Three.js

UX Archive Animated Reviews

We have no reviews of UX Archive Animated yet.
Be the first one to post

Three.js Reviews

Top 20 Javascript Libraries
Cross-browser JS library and API that allows for the creation of beautiful animations, Three.js relies on WebGL rather than conventional browser-plugins. Through its library utilities, developers can include complex 3D animations on their website without much effort. Three.js include many features like geometry, lights, materials, shaders, effects, scenes, data loaders,...
Source: hackr.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Three.js seems to be a lot more popular than UX Archive Animated. While we know about 248 links to Three.js, we've tracked only 2 mentions of UX Archive Animated. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

UX Archive Animated mentions (2)

Three.js mentions (248)

  • React Three Ecosystem
    Note three.js [1] has nothing to do with React out of the box though, this page highlights an atypical way of using three.js through a popular React binding. [1] https://threejs.org/. - Source: Hacker News / 18 days ago
  • Turn your phone into a wireless Joy-Con with SyncoPath
    The phone in the codepath sample got rendered using Three.js. For fun, I also added some beep sound generated using ZZfx when you tap. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • How to Build a Portfolio Website with React
    Also, to make your portfolio stand out to recruiters and clients, you can add some creative and interactive animations to it. The following libraries can help you easily do this: Framer Motion, tsParticles, and Three.js. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Rant: state of generative AI in code generation.
    In my experience with AI code generation, in visual projects like UI development or JavaScript based animation (using three.js or p5.js) etc. AI tools work pretty well. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • My son (9 yrs old) used plain JavaScript to make a game, and wants your feedback
    After he's done with v2, might I propose... THE GAMEY GAME 3D ?? https://threejs.org/ I started coding at 9 as well (which was a long time ago now), so I was very happy to play and see this today. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing UX Archive Animated and Three.js, you can also consider the following products

Mobbin - Latest mobile design patterns & elements library

p5.js - JS library for creating graphic and interactive experiences

UI Patterns - Level up with interactive mobile design patterns

PixiJS - Fast and flexible WebGL-based HTML5 game and app development library.

pttrns - iPhone and iPad user interface patterns

Paper.js - Open source vector graphics scripting framework that runs on top of the HTML5 Canvas.

Loading...