Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

UX Archive Animated VS mmm.page

Compare UX Archive Animated VS mmm.page and see what are their differences

RealityMAX
RealityMAX is the AI-powered 3D design collaboration platform, 100% online. Cooperate remotely with your colleagues on 3D projects and easily share your work with clients. Create Web3D and AR experiences in a snap, without a line of code. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

UX Archive Animated logo UX Archive Animated

iOS apps animated user flows

mmm.page logo mmm.page

Dead simple, drag & drop personal websites
  • UX Archive Animated Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-22
  • mmm.page Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-02-13

UX Archive Animated features and specs

  • Comprehensive Collection
    UX Archive Animated offers a wide range of well-documented user interactions from popular mobile apps, making it a valuable resource for UX professionals seeking inspiration or reference.
  • Visual Clarity
    The site provides clean and clear animations that help users understand the flow of interactions within an app, which is especially useful for practitioners who need to visualize complex processes.
  • Categorization
    Interactions are well-categorized by types such as 'onboarding,' 'search,' 'checkout,' etc., which makes it easier for users to find specific examples relevant to their current project needs.
  • High-Quality Content
    Each interaction example is carefully selected and usually represents high-quality user experience practices, serving as good benchmarks for design.
  • Frequent Updates
    The platform is regularly updated with new interactions from newly popular apps, ensuring that the content remains fresh and relevant.

Possible disadvantages of UX Archive Animated

  • Limited Interactivity
    While UX Archive Animated offers good visual representations, the limited interactivity of these animations may not provide a fully immersive experience for users trying to understand micro-interactions.
  • Subscription Model
    Some valuable features and full access to the archive require a subscription, which might be a barrier for casual users or those with limited budgets.
  • Focus on Mobile
    The archive primarily focuses on mobile app interactions, potentially leaving out a rich array of web UX examples that could be equally valuable to designers.
  • Lack of Depth in Analysis
    While the animations are visually informative, they often lack detailed explanations or context about why certain UX decisions were made, which can limit their educational value.
  • Search Functionality
    The search functionality could be more advanced, as sometimes it can be challenging to find specific interactions unless they are among the most common categories.

mmm.page features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    mmm.page offers a highly intuitive and simple drag-and-drop interface, making it easy for users of all technical skill levels to create and customize their own web pages.
  • Visual Customization
    Users can visually design their pages with a wide range of customization options including text, images, and other media elements without needing to write any code.
  • Fast Setup
    Creating a page on mmm.page is quick and requires minimal setup, allowing users to establish their web presence in a matter of minutes.
  • Creative Freedom
    The platform provides a high level of creative freedom, letting users experiment with different designs and layouts to create unique and personalized web pages.
  • Free Version
    mmm.page offers a free tier that enables users to create and publish pages without any costs, making it accessible for hobbyists and small projects.

Possible disadvantages of mmm.page

  • Limited Functionality
    While it is user-friendly, mmm.page may lack advanced features and functionalities that more experienced users or businesses might need, such as e-commerce integrations, SEO tools, and custom domain support.
  • Scalability Issues
    The platform is potentially less suitable for large projects or websites that require frequent updates and complex interactions as it is designed primarily for simpler, smaller-scale pages.
  • Dependency on the Platform
    Users are dependent on mmm.page's hosting and services. If the platform experiences downtime or discontinues services, it could disrupt access to their web pages.
  • Branding Limitations
    Free users might face limitations in terms of branding and might have to display mmm.page's branding on their web pages, which can be a drawback for professional or business use.

Analysis of UX Archive Animated

Overall verdict

  • Yes, UX Archive Animated is considered a good resource for design professionals and enthusiasts interested in the intricacies of UI/UX design, especially in the context of mobile apps.

Why this product is good

  • UX Archive Animated is well-regarded because it provides a comprehensive collection of user interface animations from a wide range of mobile applications. It is a valuable resource for designers looking to study and draw inspiration from real-world examples of animations and transitions.

Recommended for

    This resource is recommended for UX/UI designers, design students, product managers, and anyone interested in understanding and improving mobile app user experiences through animation.

Analysis of mmm.page

Overall verdict

  • Yes, mmm.page is a good tool for creating custom web pages, particularly for those who seek flexibility and ease of use in their web design process.

Why this product is good

  • mmm.page provides an innovative platform for users to create extremely customizable and interactive web pages without the need for extensive coding knowledge. Its intuitive drag-and-drop interface and wide range of design elements make it appealing for both novices and professionals looking to quickly build engaging web content.

Recommended for

  • content creators
  • designers
  • small business owners
  • freelancers
  • educators
  • hobbyists

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to UX Archive Animated and mmm.page)

UX Archive Animated

mmm.page

Design Tools
66 66%
Design Tools
34% 34
Website Builder
0 0%
Website Builder
100% 100
Web App
53 53%
Web App
47% 47
Design Inspiration
100 100%
Design Inspiration
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using UX Archive Animated and mmm.page. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, mmm.page seems to be a lot more popular than UX Archive Animated. While we know about 28 links to mmm.page, we've tracked only 2 mentions of UX Archive Animated. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

UX Archive Animated mentions (2)

mmm.page mentions (28)

  • Show HN: Verysmall.site – vibecode single page websites
    I don’t really get it. The examples linked from the homepage are _so_ simple they might as well just be built with one or two templates and a WYSIWYG editor. I don’t get why they need to be vibe-coded at all. Although maybe the issue is just that you haven’t picked the best examples? The one you linked in a comment with the raining emojis is a way better example that shows the flexibility (and the fun!) of this, I... - Source: Hacker News / 13 days ago
  • WEIRD – a way to be on the web
    Still too Web 2.0 template like/soulless- https://mmm.page/ is much better for unique sites made by humans especially if you have draw things. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • The Static Site Paradox
    There was a restaurant I went to in CDMX this summer and their menu was a public preview link to a document in Figma. I couldn't stop laughing at the fact but delighted by how well it just worked. I love this stuff. I have tons of little single HTML file sites I make from this [Vue template](https://vue-template.spaghet.me/). I also have sites just published as public Notion docs, inline photo libraries from... - Source: Hacker News / 8 months ago
  • Hot Page – a graphical site builder
    Love the aesthetic they're using here. Reminds me of another project in this same vein https://mmm.page/. - Source: Hacker News / 10 months ago
  • Curating my corner of the Internet with a freehand web editor
    And no affiliation, but I've been enjoying https://mmm.page which isn't open or self hostable, but also a long the same lines. (I think I found it here on HN). - Source: Hacker News / 12 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing UX Archive Animated and mmm.page, you can also consider the following products

Mobbin - Latest mobile design patterns & elements library

Carrd - Simple, responsive one-page site creator.

UI Patterns - Level up with interactive mobile design patterns

Dorik - Dorik AI Website Builder | Create Beautiful and Custom Websites in Minutes with AI– No Coding Needed

pttrns - iPhone and iPad user interface patterns

Makeswift - 🎨 No-code website builder with the power & detail of a design tool⠀✌️ Say goodbye to rigid templates to let your creativity come to life⠀👯‍♀️ Collaborate in real time with your team⠀⚡️ Visually build high-performing websites powered by Next.

Loading...