Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

UX Archive Animated VS Makeswift

Compare UX Archive Animated VS Makeswift and see what are their differences

Umso
The Website Builder for Startups featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

UX Archive Animated logo UX Archive Animated

iOS apps animated user flows

Makeswift logo Makeswift

🎨 No-code website builder with the power & detail of a design tool⠀✌️ Say goodbye to rigid templates to let your creativity come to life⠀👯‍♀️ Collaborate in real time with your team⠀⚡️ Visually build high-performing websites powered by Next.
  • UX Archive Animated Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-22
  • Makeswift Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-14

UX Archive Animated features and specs

  • Comprehensive Collection
    UX Archive Animated offers a wide range of well-documented user interactions from popular mobile apps, making it a valuable resource for UX professionals seeking inspiration or reference.
  • Visual Clarity
    The site provides clean and clear animations that help users understand the flow of interactions within an app, which is especially useful for practitioners who need to visualize complex processes.
  • Categorization
    Interactions are well-categorized by types such as 'onboarding,' 'search,' 'checkout,' etc., which makes it easier for users to find specific examples relevant to their current project needs.
  • High-Quality Content
    Each interaction example is carefully selected and usually represents high-quality user experience practices, serving as good benchmarks for design.
  • Frequent Updates
    The platform is regularly updated with new interactions from newly popular apps, ensuring that the content remains fresh and relevant.

Possible disadvantages of UX Archive Animated

  • Limited Interactivity
    While UX Archive Animated offers good visual representations, the limited interactivity of these animations may not provide a fully immersive experience for users trying to understand micro-interactions.
  • Subscription Model
    Some valuable features and full access to the archive require a subscription, which might be a barrier for casual users or those with limited budgets.
  • Focus on Mobile
    The archive primarily focuses on mobile app interactions, potentially leaving out a rich array of web UX examples that could be equally valuable to designers.
  • Lack of Depth in Analysis
    While the animations are visually informative, they often lack detailed explanations or context about why certain UX decisions were made, which can limit their educational value.
  • Search Functionality
    The search functionality could be more advanced, as sometimes it can be challenging to find specific interactions unless they are among the most common categories.

Makeswift features and specs

  • Easy to Use
    Makeswift is designed with a user-friendly interface, making website building intuitive and accessible even for those with little to no technical experience.
  • Drag-and-Drop Functionality
    The platform offers drag-and-drop functionality, allowing users to customize their websites easily without needing to write any code.
  • Customization Options
    Users have access to a wide variety of design elements and templates, enabling them to create personalized websites that meet their specific needs.
  • Responsive Design
    Websites built with Makeswift are responsive, ensuring they look and function well on a variety of devices, including mobile phones and tablets.
  • Integration Capabilities
    Makeswift supports integrations with various third-party tools and services, allowing users to extend the functionality of their websites.

Possible disadvantages of Makeswift

  • Limited Advanced Features
    While Makeswift is great for basic website building, it may lack some advanced features required by professional developers or for complex projects.
  • Pricing
    Depending on the plan chosen, the pricing might be a barrier for individuals or small businesses with limited budgets.
  • Dependency on Platform
    Users are reliant on Makeswift's platform, meaning any downtime or service issues could affect website availability and performance.
  • SEO Optimization Limitations
    Some users might find the SEO features to be less comprehensive compared to those offered by dedicated SEO tools.
  • Learning Curve for Complex Customizations
    While basic customization is straightforward, users attempting complex customizations may face a steeper learning curve.

Analysis of UX Archive Animated

Overall verdict

  • Yes, UX Archive Animated is considered a good resource for design professionals and enthusiasts interested in the intricacies of UI/UX design, especially in the context of mobile apps.

Why this product is good

  • UX Archive Animated is well-regarded because it provides a comprehensive collection of user interface animations from a wide range of mobile applications. It is a valuable resource for designers looking to study and draw inspiration from real-world examples of animations and transitions.

Recommended for

    This resource is recommended for UX/UI designers, design students, product managers, and anyone interested in understanding and improving mobile app user experiences through animation.

Analysis of Makeswift

Overall verdict

  • Makeswift is a good option for individuals and businesses seeking a straightforward, no-code solution to create professional-looking websites with ease. However, it may not be suitable for those who require highly advanced customization options or are comfortable with coding.

Why this product is good

  • Makeswift is a visual website builder designed for those who want to create and manage beautiful, responsive websites without needing to write code. Its user-friendly interface allows for drag-and-drop functionality, making it accessible to designers and marketers alike. Additionally, Makeswift offers integrations with various tools and services, which can enhance the functionality and scalability of the websites built on the platform.

Recommended for

  • Small to medium-sized businesses wanting a professional online presence.
  • Designers who prefer visual editing tools over coding.
  • Marketers who need to quickly adapt and deploy landing pages.
  • Entrepreneurs looking for an easy-to-use website builder.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to UX Archive Animated and Makeswift)

UX Archive Animated

Makeswift

Design Tools
73 73%
Design Tools
27% 27
Website Builder
0 0%
Website Builder
100% 100
Web App
74 74%
Web App
26% 26
Design Inspiration
100 100%
Design Inspiration
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using UX Archive Animated and Makeswift. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, UX Archive Animated seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

UX Archive Animated mentions (2)

Makeswift mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Makeswift yet. Tracking of Makeswift recommendations started around Sep 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing UX Archive Animated and Makeswift, you can also consider the following products

Mobbin - Latest mobile design patterns & elements library

Unstack - Build high performance websites, blogs, and landing pages that integrate with your existing marketing stack to drive traffic, leads, and sales for your business.

UI Patterns - Level up with interactive mobile design patterns

Dorik - Dorik AI Website Builder | Create Beautiful and Custom Websites in Minutes with AI– No Coding Needed

pttrns - iPhone and iPad user interface patterns

mmm.page - Dead simple, drag & drop personal websites

Loading...