Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

UX Archive Animated VS Cwiki

Compare UX Archive Animated VS Cwiki and see what are their differences

UX Archive Animated logo UX Archive Animated

iOS apps animated user flows

Cwiki logo Cwiki

A Command line interface for searching Wikipedia!
  • UX Archive Animated Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-22
  • Cwiki Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-21

UX Archive Animated features and specs

  • Comprehensive Collection
    UX Archive Animated offers a wide range of well-documented user interactions from popular mobile apps, making it a valuable resource for UX professionals seeking inspiration or reference.
  • Visual Clarity
    The site provides clean and clear animations that help users understand the flow of interactions within an app, which is especially useful for practitioners who need to visualize complex processes.
  • Categorization
    Interactions are well-categorized by types such as 'onboarding,' 'search,' 'checkout,' etc., which makes it easier for users to find specific examples relevant to their current project needs.
  • High-Quality Content
    Each interaction example is carefully selected and usually represents high-quality user experience practices, serving as good benchmarks for design.
  • Frequent Updates
    The platform is regularly updated with new interactions from newly popular apps, ensuring that the content remains fresh and relevant.

Possible disadvantages of UX Archive Animated

  • Limited Interactivity
    While UX Archive Animated offers good visual representations, the limited interactivity of these animations may not provide a fully immersive experience for users trying to understand micro-interactions.
  • Subscription Model
    Some valuable features and full access to the archive require a subscription, which might be a barrier for casual users or those with limited budgets.
  • Focus on Mobile
    The archive primarily focuses on mobile app interactions, potentially leaving out a rich array of web UX examples that could be equally valuable to designers.
  • Lack of Depth in Analysis
    While the animations are visually informative, they often lack detailed explanations or context about why certain UX decisions were made, which can limit their educational value.
  • Search Functionality
    The search functionality could be more advanced, as sometimes it can be challenging to find specific interactions unless they are among the most common categories.

Cwiki features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to UX Archive Animated and Cwiki)
Design Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Productivity
0 0%
100% 100
Web App
76 76%
24% 24
Design Inspiration
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using UX Archive Animated and Cwiki. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, UX Archive Animated seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

UX Archive Animated mentions (2)

Cwiki mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Cwiki yet. Tracking of Cwiki recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing UX Archive Animated and Cwiki, you can also consider the following products

Mobbin - Latest mobile design patterns & elements library

Commandline Challenge - Test your command line skills

UI Patterns - Level up with interactive mobile design patterns

nodo - Manage your daily tasks in the command line

pttrns - iPhone and iPad user interface patterns

Prompt - Prompt provides fully-integrated writing education solutions, combining instruction, curriculum, and feedback. We support educational institutions, companies, and individuals.