Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

UX Archive Animated VS Anime.js

Compare UX Archive Animated VS Anime.js and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

UX Archive Animated logo UX Archive Animated

iOS apps animated user flows

Anime.js logo Anime.js

Lightweight JavaScript animation library
  • UX Archive Animated Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-22
  • Anime.js Homepage
    Homepage //
    2024-07-18

UX Archive Animated features and specs

  • Comprehensive Collection
    UX Archive Animated offers a wide range of well-documented user interactions from popular mobile apps, making it a valuable resource for UX professionals seeking inspiration or reference.
  • Visual Clarity
    The site provides clean and clear animations that help users understand the flow of interactions within an app, which is especially useful for practitioners who need to visualize complex processes.
  • Categorization
    Interactions are well-categorized by types such as 'onboarding,' 'search,' 'checkout,' etc., which makes it easier for users to find specific examples relevant to their current project needs.
  • High-Quality Content
    Each interaction example is carefully selected and usually represents high-quality user experience practices, serving as good benchmarks for design.
  • Frequent Updates
    The platform is regularly updated with new interactions from newly popular apps, ensuring that the content remains fresh and relevant.

Possible disadvantages of UX Archive Animated

  • Limited Interactivity
    While UX Archive Animated offers good visual representations, the limited interactivity of these animations may not provide a fully immersive experience for users trying to understand micro-interactions.
  • Subscription Model
    Some valuable features and full access to the archive require a subscription, which might be a barrier for casual users or those with limited budgets.
  • Focus on Mobile
    The archive primarily focuses on mobile app interactions, potentially leaving out a rich array of web UX examples that could be equally valuable to designers.
  • Lack of Depth in Analysis
    While the animations are visually informative, they often lack detailed explanations or context about why certain UX decisions were made, which can limit their educational value.
  • Search Functionality
    The search functionality could be more advanced, as sometimes it can be challenging to find specific interactions unless they are among the most common categories.

Anime.js features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Anime.js has a clear and concise API which makes it easy to use for both beginners and experienced developers.
  • Lightweight
    With a small file size, Anime.js doesn't add much overhead to your project, helping to maintain fast load times.
  • Versatility
    Anime.js provides a wide range of animation options including CSS properties, DOM attributes, SVG, and more, making it versatile for various types of projects.
  • Performance
    Anime.js is optimized for high performance, ensuring smooth animations even with complex sequences.
  • Modular Design
    Its modular nature allows developers to import only what they need, improving efficiency and reducing bloat.
  • Comprehensive Documentation
    The official documentation is extensive and includes examples, which helps developers quickly understand and implement animations.
  • Community Support
    There is a growing community around Anime.js, providing forums, tutorials, and resources for additional support.

Possible disadvantages of Anime.js

  • Limited Built-in Easing Functions
    While Anime.js does support custom easing functions, the range of built-in easing functions is limited compared to some other animation libraries.
  • No Official Plugin System
    Anime.js does not have an official plugin system, which could limit extensibility and integration with other tools.
  • Learning Curve for Complex Animations
    For very complex animations or sequences, the learning curve can be steep, and the code may become hard to manage.
  • Lack of Native Support for 3D Animations
    Anime.js does not natively support 3D animations, which might require integrating other libraries for such requirements.
  • Dependency Management
    For projects already using other animation libraries, integrating Anime.js can add complexity to dependency management.

Analysis of UX Archive Animated

Overall verdict

  • Yes, UX Archive Animated is considered a good resource for design professionals and enthusiasts interested in the intricacies of UI/UX design, especially in the context of mobile apps.

Why this product is good

  • UX Archive Animated is well-regarded because it provides a comprehensive collection of user interface animations from a wide range of mobile applications. It is a valuable resource for designers looking to study and draw inspiration from real-world examples of animations and transitions.

Recommended for

    This resource is recommended for UX/UI designers, design students, product managers, and anyone interested in understanding and improving mobile app user experiences through animation.

Analysis of Anime.js

Overall verdict

  • Yes, Anime.js is a good and reliable choice for developers looking to implement animations on the web. It strikes a good balance between power and simplicity, making it accessible for both beginners and experienced developers.

Why this product is good

  • Anime.js is considered a versatile and powerful animation library because it provides a simple yet flexible API that makes it easy to create complex animations. It supports a wide range of properties including CSS, SVG, DOM attributes, and JavaScript objects, which gives developers a lot of creative freedom. Additionally, its lightweight nature ensures that it doesn't heavily impact the performance of web projects.

Recommended for

  • Web developers looking to create smooth and complex animations.
  • Projects that require lightweight yet powerful animation capabilities.
  • Developers who are familiar with JavaScript and prefer a straightforward API.

UX Archive Animated videos

No UX Archive Animated videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Anime.js videos

Intro to Anime.js - The JavaScript Animation Engine

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to UX Archive Animated and Anime.js)
Design Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Javascript UI Libraries
0 0%
100% 100
Web App
100 100%
0% 0
Charting Libraries
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using UX Archive Animated and Anime.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare UX Archive Animated and Anime.js

UX Archive Animated Reviews

We have no reviews of UX Archive Animated yet.
Be the first one to post

Anime.js Reviews

Top 20 Javascript Libraries
One of the best animation libraries that makes staggering follow-through animations so simple, Anime.js is light-weight and comes with a clean yet powerful API. With Anime, timing plays an important role, and you can set various properties of CSS at different timings on the same element, and the element moves smoothly as per the transforms. Anime works with SVG, CSS, HTML,...
Source: hackr.io

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Anime.js seems to be a lot more popular than UX Archive Animated. While we know about 52 links to Anime.js, we've tracked only 2 mentions of UX Archive Animated. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

UX Archive Animated mentions (2)

Anime.js mentions (52)

  • 6 CSS animation libraries to bring your project to life in 2025
    Moving Letters is a CSS animations library that focuses on text animations. It uses Anime JS in the background. In principle, you can use the animations in any other element you wish, but it works best with text animations. - Source: dev.to / 2 days ago
  • Webflow makes GSAP 100% free – plus more updates
    To be fair, https://animejs.com gave me the same vibe. In the sense that the author obsesses over details, while also being very educational. - Source: Hacker News / 27 days ago
  • Webflow makes GSAP 100% free – plus more updates
    I keep hearing about it, but I've never used it. Why would I use it over https://animejs.com ? - Source: Hacker News / 27 days ago
  • ✨"Day 1 with Anime.js — Breathing Life into a Static Webpage"
    Hey Devs! 👋 Today marks Day 1 of my journey into learning Anime.js, a lightweight JavaScript animation library that makes adding animations to your web projects ridiculously fun and powerful. In this article, I’ll walk you through how I animated a simple landing page using Anime.js — from setup to final smooth transitions. - Source: dev.to / about 1 month ago
  • Anime JS , a JavaScript animation library
    Documentation Link - https://animejs.com/ Package Install by using - npm I animejs Anime.js V4 works by importing ES modules like so:. - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing UX Archive Animated and Anime.js, you can also consider the following products

UI Patterns - Level up with interactive mobile design patterns

Pixi.js - Fast lightweight 2D library that works across all devices

Mobbin - Latest mobile design patterns & elements library

p5.js - JS library for creating graphic and interactive experiences

pttrns - iPhone and iPad user interface patterns

GSAP - GSAP (GreenSock Animation Platform) is a suite of JavaScript tools for high-performance animations that work in all major browsers.