Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

User Interviews VS locust

Compare User Interviews VS locust and see what are their differences

UserGuiding
Create in-app experiences with the most straightforward product adoption platform — quick implementation, lasting user engagement. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

User Interviews logo User Interviews

User Interviews is a tool to recruit participants for product tests and market research.

locust logo locust

An open source load testing tool written in Python.
  • User Interviews Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-30
  • locust Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-11

User Interviews features and specs

  • Large Participant Pool
    User Interviews offers access to a diverse and extensive participant pool, making it easier to find suitable candidates for research.
  • Simplified Recruitment Process
    The platform streamlines the recruitment process, helping researchers save time and reduce the administrative burden associated with finding and scheduling participants.
  • Variable Incentives Management
    User Interviews allows researchers to manage different types of incentives (e.g., cash, gift cards) to attract participants, offering flexibility and reducing overhead.
  • Advanced Filtering Options
    The platform provides advanced filtering options to help researchers narrow down candidates by demographics, professional background, and more, ensuring the right participants are selected.
  • Automated Scheduling
    User Interviews features automated scheduling tools, which synchronize with calendars and communicate with participants, reducing the complexity of arranging meetings.

Possible disadvantages of User Interviews

  • Cost
    User Interviews can be relatively expensive, especially for smaller teams or solo researchers, which may be a barrier to entry for some users.
  • Platform Learning Curve
    New users or those unfamiliar with the platform may face a learning curve when navigating and utilizing all the features offered by User Interviews.
  • Participant Availability
    Despite the large participant pool, there can be cases where specific participant criteria are challenging to meet, potentially delaying the research process.
  • Service Limitations
    The platform may not offer all the specific types of user research needed (e.g., longitudinal studies, in-person focus groups), which can limit its applicability for certain projects.
  • Dependence on Internet Stability
    The effectiveness of online interviews and the platform itself is highly dependent on internet stability, which may pose issues in locations with poor internet connectivity.

locust features and specs

  • Scalability
    Locust is designed to distribute the load tests across multiple machines, allowing for high scalability and the ability to simulate millions of users.
  • Python-based
    The tool is written in Python, which makes it highly flexible and suitable for those who are familiar with the language. You can write custom test scenarios easily.
  • Web-based UI
    Locust provides a user-friendly web-based interface that makes it easy to monitor and control the test execution in real-time.
  • Real-time monitoring
    During test execution, you get real-time statistics and charts that help in monitoring the performance and load.
  • Open-source
    Being an open-source tool, Locust allows for community contributions and is free to use, which helps in continuous improvement and support from the user base.

Possible disadvantages of locust

  • Setup Complexity
    Initial setup can be somewhat complex, especially for large scale or distributed tests. Requires experience with Python and potentially other infrastructure setups.
  • Resource Intensive
    Locust can be resource-intensive, requiring significant compute resources, particularly when simulating large numbers of users.
  • Steeper Learning Curve
    Despite its flexibility, the requirement to write test scenarios in Python may present a learning curve for users not familiar with programming.
  • Limited Protocol Support
    Primarily designed for HTTP/HTTPS protocols, Locust might not be suitable for load testing applications that use other protocols without additional customization.
  • Dependence on External Libraries
    While the use of Python offers flexibility, it also means that you might need to rely on external libraries and tools, which can introduce dependency management issues.

User Interviews videos

+ Add

User Interviews Review: A Legit Way to Make $50-200 an Hour for Your Opinion?

More videos:

  • Review - User Interviews: 5 Tips & Tricks For UX Researchers
  • Review - User Interviews Done Right

locust videos

+ Add

Locust review - GTA Online guides

More videos:

  • Review - GTA Online: Ocelot Locust Review
  • Review - GTA 5 - DLC Vehicle Customization - Ocelot Locust and Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to User Interviews and locust)

User Interviews

locust

User Experience
100 100%
User Experience
0% 0
Monitoring Tools
0 0%
Monitoring Tools
100% 100
UX Research
100 100%
UX Research
0% 0
Website Testing
0 0%
Website Testing
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using User Interviews and locust. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, locust should be more popular than User Interviews. It has been mentiond 61 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

User Interviews mentions (17)

  • I need local playtesters for tabletop games [DFW]
    If you have a bit more budget, you can also recruit participants from online panels (like userinterviews.com or respondent.io). For an incentive, you can screen the right people to participate in your playtest. Keep in mind you will need to do some vetting and make sure you're not getting "professional" participants. Source: about 2 years ago
  • B2b user testing
    I used userinterviews.com recently for a really specific type of targeted user and was impressed with their ability to get folks. It isn't cheap, and I don't know if it would work in other cases, but I would suggest checking it out. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Where do you guys get user testers for a reasonable fee?
    Userinterviews.com is where we typically go, but it's still costly (~75 per participant, depending on recruiting needs). Source: over 2 years ago
  • Thoughts on userinterviews.com?
    Hey! Does anyone have experience with userinterviews.com for getting feedback? Wondering if the price is worth it for validating my idea and talking with users who fit my target profile. Are there any other good options? Source: over 2 years ago
  • Can users themselves fill out empathy maps, problem statements, personas, etc?
    PMs constantly pay people to do interviews with them, via usertesting.com, userinterviews.com, etc. Not sure if I'm missing something here. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

locust mentions (61)

  • 3 Types of Chaos Experiments and How To Run Them
    Use load testing tools like JMeter, Gatling, or Locust to simulate demand spikes and verify that your auto-scaling rules work as expected. This will ensure that your system can handle real-world traffic patterns. - Source: dev.to / 16 days ago
  • Outgrowing Postgres: How to identify scale problems
    Use load testing tools like Apache JMeter, Gatling, or Locust to measure your application's throughput under various loads and compare it to historical data. - Source: dev.to / 3 months ago
  • Five Advanced Techniques to Improve Automated Testing by 50%
    You should also incorporate performance testing into your daily builds to catch performance regressions early. For this, you can use Locust for load testing. You can also implement performance budgets in your CI/CD pipeline. This will allow you to fail builds that don't meet performance criteria, ensuring performance doesn't degrade over time. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Why your FastAPI (or Flask) App performs poorly with high loads
    These tests were done on GCP Cloud Run using a single processor, and 512M RAM machine, and we used Locust, an incredible tool (for Python, LoL). - Source: dev.to / 7 months ago
  • How MySQL Tuning Can Dramatically Improve WordPress Performance
    Our test duration was 2 days. To handle this longer testing period, we switched from BlazeMeter (max test duration of 20 minutes) to Locust, an open-source load-testing tool. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing User Interviews and locust, you can also consider the following products

UserTesting.com - Usability testing has never been easier. Get videos of real people speaking their thoughts as they use websites, mobile apps, prototypes and more!

Apache JMeter - Apache JMeter™.

Respondent - Respondent helps you find any target audience in the world for in-person and remote research studies across all research methods including interviews, focus groups, surveys, and more. Respondent works with any research tool you already use.

Loader.io - Loader.io is a simple cloud-based load testing service

Hotjar - The #1 Leader in Heatmaps, Recordings, Surveys & More. Sign up for a 15-day free trial and start learning from real user behavior today!

gatling.io - Gatling is an open-source load testing framework based on Scala, Akka and Netty

Loading...