Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

User Interviews VS Lax.js

Compare User Interviews VS Lax.js and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

User Interviews logo User Interviews

User Interviews is a tool to recruit participants for product tests and market research.

Lax.js logo Lax.js

Create beautiful & smooth animations when you scroll
  • User Interviews Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-04-30
  • Lax.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-06

User Interviews features and specs

  • Large Participant Pool
    User Interviews offers access to a diverse and extensive participant pool, making it easier to find suitable candidates for research.
  • Simplified Recruitment Process
    The platform streamlines the recruitment process, helping researchers save time and reduce the administrative burden associated with finding and scheduling participants.
  • Variable Incentives Management
    User Interviews allows researchers to manage different types of incentives (e.g., cash, gift cards) to attract participants, offering flexibility and reducing overhead.
  • Advanced Filtering Options
    The platform provides advanced filtering options to help researchers narrow down candidates by demographics, professional background, and more, ensuring the right participants are selected.
  • Automated Scheduling
    User Interviews features automated scheduling tools, which synchronize with calendars and communicate with participants, reducing the complexity of arranging meetings.

Possible disadvantages of User Interviews

  • Cost
    User Interviews can be relatively expensive, especially for smaller teams or solo researchers, which may be a barrier to entry for some users.
  • Platform Learning Curve
    New users or those unfamiliar with the platform may face a learning curve when navigating and utilizing all the features offered by User Interviews.
  • Participant Availability
    Despite the large participant pool, there can be cases where specific participant criteria are challenging to meet, potentially delaying the research process.
  • Service Limitations
    The platform may not offer all the specific types of user research needed (e.g., longitudinal studies, in-person focus groups), which can limit its applicability for certain projects.
  • Dependence on Internet Stability
    The effectiveness of online interviews and the platform itself is highly dependent on internet stability, which may pose issues in locations with poor internet connectivity.

Lax.js features and specs

  • Lightweight
    Lax.js is a lightweight animation library, which means it doesn't add much to your project's file size, leading to faster load times compared to heavier animation libraries.
  • Ease of Use
    The library is designed with simplicity in mind, allowing developers to easily implement animations with minimal configuration and effort.
  • Smooth Animations
    Lax.js provides smooth, performant animations by leveraging CSS transforms and requestAnimationFrame, optimizing the animation process.
  • Customizability
    It offers a high degree of customizability, allowing developers to create a wide range of animations tailored to their specific needs.
  • Cross-Browser Compatibility
    Lax.js ensures that animations work consistently across different browsers, enhancing the user experience for a wider audience.

Possible disadvantages of Lax.js

  • Limited Features
    Compared to more extensive libraries like GSAP, Lax.js has a more limited set of features and capabilities, which might not be sufficient for complex animations.
  • Community Support
    The community and support around Lax.js might be smaller compared to more established libraries, potentially making it harder to find solutions and tutorials.
  • Scalability
    While great for small to medium projects, Lax.js might not scale well for very large projects that require extensive animation timelines and intricate interactions.
  • Documentation
    The documentation, while straightforward, may not be as comprehensive or detailed as that of more popular animation libraries, which can pose a challenge to new users.

User Interviews videos

User Interviews Review: A Legit Way to Make $50-200 an Hour for Your Opinion?

More videos:

  • Review - User Interviews: 5 Tips & Tricks For UX Researchers
  • Review - User Interviews Done Right

Lax.js videos

Use Rellax.js to Create this Awesome Parallax Scrolling Effect

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to User Interviews and Lax.js)
User Experience
100 100%
0% 0
Animation
0 0%
100% 100
UX Research
100 100%
0% 0
3D
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using User Interviews and Lax.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, User Interviews seems to be a lot more popular than Lax.js. While we know about 17 links to User Interviews, we've tracked only 1 mention of Lax.js. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

User Interviews mentions (17)

  • I need local playtesters for tabletop games [DFW]
    If you have a bit more budget, you can also recruit participants from online panels (like userinterviews.com or respondent.io). For an incentive, you can screen the right people to participate in your playtest. Keep in mind you will need to do some vetting and make sure you're not getting "professional" participants. Source: about 2 years ago
  • B2b user testing
    I used userinterviews.com recently for a really specific type of targeted user and was impressed with their ability to get folks. It isn't cheap, and I don't know if it would work in other cases, but I would suggest checking it out. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Where do you guys get user testers for a reasonable fee?
    Userinterviews.com is where we typically go, but it's still costly (~75 per participant, depending on recruiting needs). Source: over 2 years ago
  • Thoughts on userinterviews.com?
    Hey! Does anyone have experience with userinterviews.com for getting feedback? Wondering if the price is worth it for validating my idea and talking with users who fit my target profile. Are there any other good options? Source: over 2 years ago
  • Can users themselves fill out empathy maps, problem statements, personas, etc?
    PMs constantly pay people to do interviews with them, via usertesting.com, userinterviews.com, etc. Not sure if I'm missing something here. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

Lax.js mentions (1)

What are some alternatives?

When comparing User Interviews and Lax.js, you can also consider the following products

UserTesting.com - Usability testing has never been easier. Get videos of real people speaking their thoughts as they use websites, mobile apps, prototypes and more!

WOW.js - Animate elements on-scroll to catch attention. Such Magic.

Respondent - Respondent helps you find any target audience in the world for in-person and remote research studies across all research methods including interviews, focus groups, surveys, and more. Respondent works with any research tool you already use.

ScrollMagic - The jQuery plugin for magical scroll interactions.

Hotjar - The #1 Leader in Heatmaps, Recordings, Surveys & More. Sign up for a 15-day free trial and start learning from real user behavior today!

ScrollReveal - ScrollReveal is a tool to add scroll animations for web and mobile browsers.