Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Uppy VS SFTPGo

Compare Uppy VS SFTPGo and see what are their differences

Uppy logo Uppy

The next open source file uploader for web browsers

SFTPGo logo SFTPGo

Fully featured and highly configurable SFTP server with optional HTTP/S, FTP/S and WebDAV support - S3, Google Cloud Storage, Azure Blob
  • Uppy Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-15
  • SFTPGo Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-22

Uppy videos

Review do Inalador/Nebulizador Uppy

More videos:

  • Review - Uppy or Building a File Uploader That Won’t Bark at the Mailman — talk at Manhattan.js

SFTPGo videos

SSHFS and SFTPGo

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Uppy and SFTPGo)
Digital Asset Management
100 100%
0% 0
FTP Client
0 0%
100% 100
File Uploader
86 86%
14% 14
File Transfer
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Uppy and SFTPGo. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, SFTPGo should be more popular than Uppy. It has been mentiond 21 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Uppy mentions (12)

View more

SFTPGo mentions (21)

  • What you guys are hosting instead of Nextcloud? I'm sick of it.
    EDIT: Thanks for the recommendations from all of you!! I've chose to use the below: - Files: sftpgo - Calendar: baikal - Notes: memos (But beware, it sends opt-out telemetry) - Network folder: webdav on sftpgo. Source: 6 months ago
  • HashiCorp Did It Backwards
    > Even these projects have gotten to a level of sophistication that it would implode without big tech support. The worst thing is that all this FAANG or VC backed companies make a lot of people believe that they are the only viable way. > Why do you think you don't see any interesting oss tech from hobbyists is these days? Actually not true, just an example, - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • Running an FTP server WITHOUT admin priveleges
    This is possible using SFTPGo. The default Windows installer register SFTPGo as a Windows service. You can download the portable version and run it manually or install SFTPGo from the Scoop packages. You can use the built-in SFTPGo virtual permissions to only allow uploads. SFTPGo uses virtual users, no system users are required. Source: 11 months ago
  • Was the move to AES 256 really necessary?
    Basically it's a file storage managed over HTTPS. Nextcloud is pretty heavy, that's the reason why I using just a single statically compiled cross-platform binary SFTPgo. Source: 11 months ago
  • Simple read only ftp server
    Using SFTPGo you can easily configure read-only accounts. SFTPGo uses virtual users and virtual permissions. So you don't need to create system users for your SFTPGo users and you don't need to use chmod to make folders read-only (but the system user that SFTPGo runs as needs file system level permission to access the files/folders you want to share). Source: 11 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Uppy and SFTPGo, you can also consider the following products

Uploader Window - Easy File Uploader for your websites and apps

FileZilla Server - Download FileZilla Server 0.9.60.2 for Windows

Filestack - Simple file uploader and robust APIs for uploading, transforming, and delivering any file into your app. Filestack is a collection of tools and powerful APIs that make it simple to upload, transform, and deliver content.

vsftpd - Very secure FTP Daemon, a secure, fast FTP server for UNIX systems, including Linux.

Uploadcare - File uploading, media processing & content delivery for modern web apps

Baby FTP Server - The simplest FTP server to setup. No authentication required.