Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Uploader Window VS SFTPGo

Compare Uploader Window VS SFTPGo and see what are their differences

Uploader Window logo Uploader Window

Easy File Uploader for your websites and apps

SFTPGo logo SFTPGo

Fully featured and highly configurable SFTP server with optional HTTP/S, FTP/S and WebDAV support - S3, Google Cloud Storage, Azure Blob
  • Uploader Window Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-03
  • SFTPGo Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-22

Uploader Window videos

No Uploader Window videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

SFTPGo videos

SSHFS and SFTPGo

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Uploader Window and SFTPGo)
File Uploader
79 79%
21% 21
FTP Client
0 0%
100% 100
Digital Asset Management
100 100%
0% 0
File Transfer
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Uploader Window and SFTPGo. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, SFTPGo seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 21 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Uploader Window mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Uploader Window yet. Tracking of Uploader Window recommendations started around Mar 2021.

SFTPGo mentions (21)

  • What you guys are hosting instead of Nextcloud? I'm sick of it.
    EDIT: Thanks for the recommendations from all of you!! I've chose to use the below: - Files: sftpgo - Calendar: baikal - Notes: memos (But beware, it sends opt-out telemetry) - Network folder: webdav on sftpgo. Source: 7 months ago
  • HashiCorp Did It Backwards
    > Even these projects have gotten to a level of sophistication that it would implode without big tech support. The worst thing is that all this FAANG or VC backed companies make a lot of people believe that they are the only viable way. > Why do you think you don't see any interesting oss tech from hobbyists is these days? Actually not true, just an example, - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago
  • Running an FTP server WITHOUT admin priveleges
    This is possible using SFTPGo. The default Windows installer register SFTPGo as a Windows service. You can download the portable version and run it manually or install SFTPGo from the Scoop packages. You can use the built-in SFTPGo virtual permissions to only allow uploads. SFTPGo uses virtual users, no system users are required. Source: 11 months ago
  • Was the move to AES 256 really necessary?
    Basically it's a file storage managed over HTTPS. Nextcloud is pretty heavy, that's the reason why I using just a single statically compiled cross-platform binary SFTPgo. Source: 12 months ago
  • Simple read only ftp server
    Using SFTPGo you can easily configure read-only accounts. SFTPGo uses virtual users and virtual permissions. So you don't need to create system users for your SFTPGo users and you don't need to use chmod to make folders read-only (but the system user that SFTPGo runs as needs file system level permission to access the files/folders you want to share). Source: 12 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Uploader Window and SFTPGo, you can also consider the following products

Uppy - The next open source file uploader for web browsers

FileZilla Server - Download FileZilla Server 0.9.60.2 for Windows

Filestack - Simple file uploader and robust APIs for uploading, transforming, and delivering any file into your app. Filestack is a collection of tools and powerful APIs that make it simple to upload, transform, and deliver content.

vsftpd - Very secure FTP Daemon, a secure, fast FTP server for UNIX systems, including Linux.

Uppy.io - Next open source file uploader for web browsers

Baby FTP Server - The simplest FTP server to setup. No authentication required.