Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Upload.js VS CloudExplorer

Compare Upload.js VS CloudExplorer and see what are their differences

Limey
Limey: Connect smarter with QR codes, links, sites, and digital business cards in one place. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Reviews
  3. » Alternatives

Upload.js logo Upload.js

JavaScript File Upload Library — with Integrated Cloud Storage.

CloudExplorer logo CloudExplorer

Cloud Explorer is a open-source Amazon S3 client.
  • Upload.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-20
  • CloudExplorer Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-05

Upload.js features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

CloudExplorer features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    CloudExplorer provides an intuitive and easy-to-navigate interface, making it accessible for users with varying levels of technical expertise.
  • Broad Cloud Service Support
    The platform supports a wide range of cloud service providers, allowing users to manage multiple cloud environments from a single application.
  • Real-time Monitoring
    CloudExplorer offers real-time monitoring capabilities, enabling users to track performance and resource utilization effectively.
  • Flexible Pricing
    Flexible pricing options make it cost-effective for both small businesses and large enterprises by enabling customers to pay only for what they need.
  • Security Features
    Built-in security features in CloudExplorer ensure that data is protected through robust encryption and access controls.

Possible disadvantages of CloudExplorer

  • Limited Customization
    Some users may find the customization options limited when compared to other advanced cloud management solutions.
  • Learning Curve
    Although user-friendly, new users may still experience a learning curve when transitioning from other cloud management tools.
  • Performance Issues
    Some users have reported occasional performance lags, especially when managing large-scale cloud infrastructures.
  • Dependency on Internet Connection
    As a cloud-based platform, CloudExplorer requires a stable internet connection, which can be a limitation in areas with poor connectivity.
  • Feature Limitations in Basic Version
    The basic version of CloudExplorer may lack some advanced features that are only available in higher-tier plans, potentially necessitating additional costs.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Upload.js and CloudExplorer)

Upload.js

CloudExplorer

Digital Asset Management
54 54%
Digital Asset Management
46% 46
CDN
33 33%
CDN
67% 67
File Uploader
21 21%
File Uploader
79% 79
Content Delivery Network
100 100%
Content Delivery Network
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Upload.js and CloudExplorer. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Upload.js and CloudExplorer, you can also consider the following products

AssetPicker - A free, easy to use, cross plattform ready asset or file picker.

CarrierWave - Solution for file uploads for Rails, Sinatra and other Ruby web frameworks.

CloudFlare - Cloudflare is a global network designed to make everything you connect to the Internet secure, private, fast, and reliable.

Uppy - The next open source file uploader for web browsers

Uploadcare - File uploading, media processing & content delivery for modern web apps

jQuery File Upload - File Upload widget with multiple file selection, drag&drop support, progress bar, validation and preview images, audio and video for jQuery. Supports cross-domain, chunked and resumable file up...

Loading...