Unlock VS Payant for Messenger

Unlock mentions (19)

• Authenticate Ghost Subscribers Through API

  Unlock is a great decentralized tool that doesn't require members to be familiar with web3 to get started. Source: about 1 year ago

• Crypto bros

  This is exactly how something like Unlock Protocol works. Source: over 1 year ago

• Insider Trading in Cryptocurrency Markets

  I'll name you several. Copied from another reply I made, here's some projects to check out: - Lens Protocol [https://lens.xyz/ (one example implementation: https://lenster.xyz/)] is an early social network built on top of Polygon. - Farcaster [https://farcaster.xyz/] is another one, that takes a more hybrid approach of using Ethereum for trustless identity, but stores social stuff in a "sufficiently decentralized"... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago

• On Anti-Crypto Toxicity

  If you haven't seen it, you were not interested in looking and I doubt that any "evangelist" is going to change your mind. Anyway, if you are honestly open to change your mind, go take a look at ENS domains [0] and unlock protocol [1]. Both of these are applications that use NFTs "properly", and allow us to do things that are currently possible only with a central authority. [0]: https://ens.domains [1]:... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

• Open source Patreon-style thingy

  If you want to go with the crypto route, that's the main goal of Unlock Protocol. It's basically one of the first use cases (beyond ENS domains) where NFTs actually make sense. Source: about 2 years ago

Payant for Messenger mentions (0)