Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Universal Extractor VS Xarchiver

Compare Universal Extractor VS Xarchiver and see what are their differences

Universal Extractor logo Universal Extractor

Universal Extractor is a program designed to decompress and extract files from any type of archive or installer, such as ZIP or RAR files, self-extracting EXE ...

Xarchiver logo Xarchiver

Xarchiver, a GTK+2 only frontend to various command line archivers.
  • Universal Extractor Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-27
  • Xarchiver Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-25

Universal Extractor features and specs

  • Wide File Support
    Universal Extractor supports a vast array of archive and installer formats, making it extremely versatile for extracting files from nearly any package.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The software has an intuitive interface that makes it accessible for both novice and advanced users, facilitating easy file extraction.
  • Free and Open Source
    Universal Extractor is open source and free to use, making it a cost-effective solution without any licensing fees.
  • Portable Version
    A portable version of Universal Extractor is available, allowing users to run it from external media without installation.

Possible disadvantages of Universal Extractor

  • Lacks Compression Features
    Universal Extractor is solely focused on extraction and does not support creating or compressing archive files.
  • Limited Updates
    The software doesn't receive frequent updates, which might lead to compatibility issues with newer formats in the future.
  • Potential Stability Issues
    Some users experience occasional stability issues or crashes, particularly when dealing with very large archives.
  • Basic Feature Set
    Compared to specialized extraction tools, Universal Extractor offers a relatively basic set of features, lacking advanced options and customization.

Xarchiver features and specs

  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    Xarchiver is available on various Unix-like operating systems, making it versatile and accessible for users on different platforms.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The application features a simple and intuitive graphical user interface, which makes archive management easy for both novice and experienced users.
  • Support for Multiple Formats
    Xarchiver supports a wide range of archive formats, including ZIP, RAR, 7Z, TAR, and others, providing flexibility in managing different types of compressed files.
  • Lightweight
    As a lightweight application, Xarchiver consumes minimal system resources, ensuring smooth performance even on low-spec machines.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source project, Xarchiver allows users to inspect the source code, contribute to its development, and ensure transparency in its operation.

Possible disadvantages of Xarchiver

  • Limited Advanced Features
    Compared to some other archive managers, Xarchiver lacks advanced features like built-in encryption or repair tools for damaged archives.
  • Dependency on External Tools
    For handling certain archive formats, Xarchiver depends on external utilities, which might require additional installations and maintenance.
  • No Command-Line Interface
    Xarchiver primarily operates through its graphical interface, lacking a command-line interface which might be preferred by advanced users for automated scripting.
  • Occasional Bugs
    As with many open-source projects, users may encounter occasional bugs or stability issues, especially when new formats or features are introduced.
  • Limited Updates
    Development and updates may be less frequent compared to commercial archive managers, potentially resulting in slower adaptation to new archive standards.

Universal Extractor videos

Universal Extractor 2018 Review, Free Download For Windows + MAC

Xarchiver videos

Xarchiver Top # 5 Facts

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Universal Extractor and Xarchiver)
Archiver
59 59%
41% 41
Archive Manager
59 59%
41% 41
Data Compression
54 54%
46% 46
HR
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Universal Extractor and Xarchiver. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Xarchiver seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Universal Extractor mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Universal Extractor yet. Tracking of Universal Extractor recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Xarchiver mentions (1)

  • Encryption Tools
    7-Zip is a free and open-source file archiver, which is a software used to compress groups of files. The command-line program p7zip is used on Linux, MacOS, and other platforms, and it integrates into many interfaces such as FileRoller, Xarchiver, and Ark. Source: over 3 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Universal Extractor and Xarchiver, you can also consider the following products

Bandizip - Bandizip : All-In-One Free Zip Archiver. Bandizip is a lightweight, fast and free All-In-One Zip Archiver.

File Roller - File Roller is an archive manager for the GNOME desktop environment.

WinZip - The world's best file compressor in the world.

BetterZip - Extract Only Files You Really Need. Create Archives. Update Archives. Protect Your Data.

The Unarchiver - Get the top application for archives on Mac. It's a RAR extractor, it allows you to unzip files, and works with dozens of other formats.

NanaZip - NanaZip is an open source file archiver intended for the modern Windows experience