Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Unity EdgeConnect VS Cisco Meraki SD-WAN

Compare Unity EdgeConnect VS Cisco Meraki SD-WAN and see what are their differences

Unity EdgeConnect logo Unity EdgeConnect

Unity EdgeConnect The Business-Driven SD-WAN Edge Platform: Unlike router-centric and basic SD-WAN solutions, EdgeConnect enables you to shift to a business-first networking model.

Cisco Meraki SD-WAN logo Cisco Meraki SD-WAN

What is SD-WAN?
  • Unity EdgeConnect Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-24
  • Cisco Meraki SD-WAN Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-01-31

Unity EdgeConnect features and specs

  • Enhanced Performance
    Unity EdgeConnect optimizes application performance by identifying and steering business-critical applications over the fastest routes, reducing latency and improving user experience.
  • Cost Efficiency
    The platform reduces bandwidth costs by utilizing low-cost broadband connections and optimizing the use of available network resources, ultimately reducing operational expenses.
  • Increased Security
    Unity EdgeConnect offers end-to-end encryption and segmentation to ensure data security while traversing the internet, providing a secure solution for enterprises.
  • Simplified WAN Management
    The centralized management interface allows for simplified network configuration, monitoring, and management, reducing the complexity of managing wide area networks.
  • Improved Reliability
    With built-in path conditioning and dynamic path control, Unity EdgeConnect ensures consistent and reliable network performance even in the event of link failures.

Possible disadvantages of Unity EdgeConnect

  • Initial Setup Complexity
    The initial setup and deployment of Unity EdgeConnect can be complex and may require professional services or experienced IT staff for proper configuration.
  • Integration Challenges
    Integrating Unity EdgeConnect with existing legacy systems might pose challenges, requiring careful planning and potential alterations to the current infrastructure.
  • High Initial Cost
    The upfront investment for deploying Unity EdgeConnect may be significant, particularly for smaller organizations or those with limited budgets.
  • Learning Curve
    Administrators might face a learning curve when transitioning to Unity EdgeConnect, particularly if they are accustomed to traditional WAN management tools.
  • Dependency on Internet Connectivity
    As a software-defined WAN solution, Unity EdgeConnect's performance is highly dependent on the availability and quality of internet connections, which can be a limitation in areas with poor connectivity.

Cisco Meraki SD-WAN features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Cisco Meraki SD-WAN offers a cloud-managed solution that simplifies network management with an intuitive user interface, making it accessible even to users with limited technical expertise.
  • Scalability
    The platform is highly scalable, allowing organizations to easily expand their network infrastructure across multiple sites with minimal configuration and overhead.
  • Centralized Management
    Meraki's dashboard provides centralized management, which enables IT teams to monitor and configure network settings from a single location, increasing operational efficiency.
  • Security Features
    Built-in security features such as firewalls, intrusion detection, and content filtering help protect against threats, reducing the need for separate security devices.
  • Automatic Firmware Updates
    Devices receive automatic firmware and security updates from the cloud, ensuring that networks remain up to date with the latest features and security patches.

Possible disadvantages of Cisco Meraki SD-WAN

  • Cost
    Cisco Meraki SD-WAN can be more expensive compared to other SD-WAN solutions, particularly for small businesses or startups with limited budgets.
  • Dependence on Cloud Connectivity
    Since Meraki relies on cloud-based management, any disruption in internet connectivity can impact the ability to manage and monitor network settings.
  • Limited Customization
    The solution may lack advanced customization features that some enterprises require, potentially leading to limitations in fine-tuning their network configurations.
  • Vendor Lock-in
    Adopting Cisco Meraki can lead to vendor lock-in, as the hardware and software are designed to work within the Cisco ecosystem, limiting flexibility to switch to different vendors in the future.
  • Performance Variability
    While generally reliable, performance can vary depending on the quality of the underlying internet connections, which may affect overall network performance.

Unity EdgeConnect videos

No Unity EdgeConnect videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Cisco Meraki SD-WAN videos

CISCO MERAKI SD-WAN

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Unity EdgeConnect and Cisco Meraki SD-WAN)
Managed Security Services
Monitoring Tools
16 16%
84% 84
Cloud Storage
38 38%
62% 62
Security & Privacy
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Unity EdgeConnect and Cisco Meraki SD-WAN. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Unity EdgeConnect and Cisco Meraki SD-WAN, you can also consider the following products

Cisco SD-WAN - SD-WAN is a software-defined approach to managing the wide-area network, or WAN.

FortiGate SD-WAN - SD-WAN

VeloCloud - SD-WAN

Barracuda CloudGen Firewall - Barracuda's cloud-ready firewalls improve site-to-site connectivity and provide enterprises with uninterrupted access to applications hosted in the cloud.

Aryaka Networks - The only SD-WAN for global enterprises that combines a purpose-built private network, optimization and acceleration techniques, connectivity to cloud platforms, and network visibility in a single solution that is delivered as-a-service.

Versa Cloud IP Platform - Versa provides Network Function Virtualization Security (NFV) based SD-WAN & SD-Security products with full multitenancy and flexible microservices capable architecture.