Software Alternatives & Reviews

ufw VS Fail2ban

Compare ufw VS Fail2ban and see what are their differences

ufw logo ufw

Ufw stands for Uncomplicated Firewall, and is program for managing a netfilter firewall.

Fail2ban logo Fail2ban

Intrusion prevention framework
  • ufw Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-15
  • Fail2ban Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-02

ufw videos

Linux Security - UFW Complete Guide (Uncomplicated Firewall)

More videos:

  • Tutorial - UFW Firewall (Uncomplicated Firewall) - Complete Tutorial

Fail2ban videos

Ubuntu Server 18.04 Administration Guide Part 10 - Securing Applications with Fail2ban

More videos:

  • Review - Securing your Cloud Server with Fail2ban
  • Review - fail2ban on FreePBX

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to ufw and Fail2ban)
Firewall
100 100%
0% 0
Cyber Security
35 35%
65% 65
Monitoring Tools
47 47%
53% 53
Web Application Security
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using ufw and Fail2ban. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare ufw and Fail2ban

ufw Reviews

8 Best Open Source Firewall to Protect Your Network
ufw (uncomplicated firewall) works with Ubuntu. It provides a command-line interface to manage the Linux kernel packet filtering system (netfilter).
Source: geekflare.com

Fail2ban Reviews

We have no reviews of Fail2ban yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, ufw seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 4 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

ufw mentions (4)

  • Cannot install gufw in fedora37
    You may already know this, but gufw is simply a graphical front-end to the Uncomplicated Firewall (ufw) service. Fedora uses the Firewalld back-end service instead of ufw. I believe you would need to replace Firewalld with ufw entirely in order to make gufw a plausible solution. Source: about 1 year ago
  • ufw --help is very bad
    I just started using ufw https://launchpad.net/ufw and I found that it only shows --help for the root command. Source: over 2 years ago
  • why UFW is open-source and GUFW is proprietary ?
    Why do you think Gufw is proprietary? It's FOSS, licensed as GPL v3, as documented here. Source: almost 3 years ago
  • Huge surge in hits to connectivitycheck.gstatic.com from my phone knocks out my PiHole
    Another option is to use UFW and rate limit incoming packets. Because it's a firewall, it will block the queries even before they hit Pi-hole, but it might be a tad more tricky to set up. I also don't know if you can set it as a limitation per client or only in general (per port/rule). I'll leave that for you to investigate further. Source: almost 3 years ago

Fail2ban mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Fail2ban yet. Tracking of Fail2ban recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing ufw and Fail2ban, you can also consider the following products

TinyWall - Lightweight and non-intrusive firewall

RdpGuard - RdpGuard allows you to protect your Remote Desktop (RDP), POP3, FTP, SMTP, IMAP, MSSQL, MySQL, VoIP/SIP from brute-force attacks by blocking attacker's IP address. Fail2Ban for Windows.

Windows 10 Firewall Control - Windows 10 Firewall Control: simple and exhaustive solution for applications network activity controlling and monitoring.

SSHGuard - SSHGuard monitors services through their logging activity.

Emsisoft Online Armor Firewall - Emsisoft Online Armor Firewall is a freemium online firewall protection system by the Emsisoft that is based on the own independent protection technology of the Emsisoft.

IPBan - Block hacking attempts on RDP, SSH, SMTP and much more