Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

TypingDNA Authenticator VS WebShell

Compare TypingDNA Authenticator VS WebShell and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

TypingDNA Authenticator logo TypingDNA Authenticator

2FA codes in your browser, secured by the way you type

WebShell logo WebShell

Bundle web app to OS X app without coding
  • TypingDNA Authenticator Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-15

100% FREE app

  • WebShell Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-03-31

TypingDNA Authenticator features and specs

  • Enhanced Security
    TypingDNA Authenticator adds an extra layer of security by using behavioral biometrics, making it harder for unauthorized users to gain access.
  • User Convenience
    Since users are already familiar with typing, this method is intuitive and non-intrusive, reducing friction in the authentication process.
  • Reduced Dependency on Physical Devices
    Unlike hardware tokens or mobile-based 2FA, behavioral biometrics do not require any additional devices, minimizing logistical challenges and costs.
  • Continuous Authentication
    Typing biometrics can be used for continuous authentication, not just at login, enhancing ongoing security throughout a user's session.
  • Low False Positive Rate
    Behavioral biometrics usually offer a low false positive rate, improving the reliability of the authentication system.

Possible disadvantages of TypingDNA Authenticator

  • Privacy Concerns
    The use of behavioral biometrics raises privacy concerns as it involves collecting and analyzing personal behavioral data which could be sensitive or misused.
  • Initial Setup Complexity
    Implementing TypingDNA Authenticator can require a complex initial setup and integration with existing systems, demanding technical expertise and resources.
  • User Adaptation
    Users may exhibit different typing behaviors over time due to various factors such as stress or injury, potentially affecting the accuracy of authentication.
  • Not Universally Applicable
    Typing biometrics may not be suitable for all user populations, particularly those who may have difficulties with typing, such as individuals with disabilities.
  • Cost
    While reducing dependency on physical devices, TypingDNA services may come with subscription costs that could be a concern for small organizations or individual users.

WebShell features and specs

  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    WebShell is built with web technologies, making it accessible across different operating systems without the need for platform-specific software development.
  • Web Technologies Utilization
    Since WebShell is based on web technologies like HTML, CSS, and JavaScript, developers can leverage their existing web development skills to create and modify the application.
  • Ease of Use
    The application is designed to be user-friendly, allowing users to execute commands in a familiar environment akin to a web browser.
  • Flexible Customization
    Users and developers can easily customize WebShell to fit their specific needs thanks to its open-source nature and use of widely-known web technologies.

Possible disadvantages of WebShell

  • Limited Functionality Compared to Native
    Being a web-based application, WebShell might not offer all the features and performance of native command line interfaces or terminal emulators.
  • Security Concerns
    Running shell commands from a web application can pose security risks, especially if not properly sandboxed or if permission controls are inadequate.
  • Dependency on Web Technologies
    As WebShell heavily relies on web technologies, it may face limitations inherent to browsers or web APIs, potentially affecting its robustness.
  • Performance Overheads
    WebShell may experience performance bottlenecks compared to native applications due to the overhead of running in a web environment.

Analysis of TypingDNA Authenticator

Overall verdict

  • TypingDNA Authenticator is generally considered a good option for biometric authentication through typing biometrics.

Why this product is good

  • TypingDNA Authenticator enhances security by using unique typing patterns to verify identity, making it difficult for unauthorized users to replicate.
  • It provides an additional layer of security beyond traditional passwords and two-factor authentication methods.
  • The solution is non-intrusive and user-friendly, making it an attractive option for both individuals and businesses looking for seamless authentication processes.

Recommended for

  • Businesses seeking to improve their cybersecurity measures without compromising user experience.
  • Individuals who prefer advanced security options that integrate easily into their daily workflows.
  • Organizations looking to implement multi-factor authentication solutions that do not rely solely on physical devices like phones or tokens.

TypingDNA Authenticator videos

How to set up GitHub two factor authentication with TypingDNA Authenticator

WebShell videos

Webshell Attacks: Not On Your Watch with RSA NetWitness Suite

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to TypingDNA Authenticator and WebShell)
Identity And Access Management
Productivity
0 0%
100% 100
APIs
100 100%
0% 0
No Code
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using TypingDNA Authenticator and WebShell. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, TypingDNA Authenticator seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 1 time since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

TypingDNA Authenticator mentions (1)

  • I created this dummy website that is using typing biometrics as 2FA. Let me know what you think.
    You can play around with the solution by creating an account on typingdna.com and see for yourself. Source: almost 4 years ago

WebShell mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of WebShell yet. Tracking of WebShell recommendations started around Mar 2021.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing TypingDNA Authenticator and WebShell, you can also consider the following products

Authenticator Hub - How to enable 2 step verification for your accounts? Check our step-by-step guides to easily activate 2FA in all your accounts.

Base Deploy - Build powerful apps faster - without coding

Google Authenticator - Google Authenticator is a multifactor app for mobile devices.

Bubble.io - Building tech is slow and expensive. Bubble is the most powerful no-code platform for creating digital products.

Microsoft Authenticator - One app to quickly and securely verify your identity online, for all of your accounts.

zeroqode - Build your app up to 10x faster with no-code app templates