Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

tus.io VS Upload.js

Compare tus.io VS Upload.js and see what are their differences

tus.io logo tus.io

File Uploads

Upload.js logo Upload.js

JavaScript File Upload Library — with Integrated Cloud Storage.
  • tus.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-07-24
  • Upload.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-20

tus.io features and specs

  • Resumable Uploads
    Tus.io protocol allows clients to pause and resume uploads at any point, which is particularly beneficial in environments with unstable internet connections. This ensures data consistency and robustness in file transfers.
  • Scalability
    The protocol is designed to handle large file uploads effectively and efficiently without overwhelming server resources, making it suitable for handling files of any size.
  • Language Agnostic
    Tus.io provides integrations and support for multiple programming languages and platforms, enabling easy adoption across different technology stacks without being tied to a specific language.
  • Simple Integration
    It is user-friendly and offers straightforward API options, allowing developers to integrate resumable upload functionality into their applications with minimal hassle.
  • Open Source
    Being an open-source protocol, Tus.io encourages community collaboration and contribution, offering transparency and shared improvements among its users.

Possible disadvantages of tus.io

  • Complex Setup
    For developers unfamiliar with the tus.io protocol, the initial setup and configuration might seem complex and require a learning curve to understand the specific implementation needs.
  • Server-Side Dependencies
    Implementing tus.io requires specific server-side support, which may involve additional setup and maintenance compared to simpler file upload solutions.
  • Limited Browser Support
    Some older browsers may not fully support the necessary APIs required for tus.io, potentially limiting its usability in certain environments.
  • Community Support
    Despite being open source, the level of community support and available resources may not match that of more established protocols or libraries, potentially leading to hurdles in problem-solving.

Upload.js features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to tus.io and Upload.js)
CDN
64 64%
36% 36
Digital Asset Management
50 50%
50% 50
File Uploader
84 84%
16% 16
Content Delivery Network
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using tus.io and Upload.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, tus.io seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 18 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

tus.io mentions (18)

  • Ask HN: How to handle user file uploads?
    We map the TUS[0] protocol to S3 multipart upload operations. This lets us obscure the S3 bucket from the client. The TUS operations are handled by a dedicated micro-service. It could be done in a Lambda or anything. Once the upload completes we kick off a workflow to virus scan, unzip, decrypt, and process the file depending on what it is. For virus scanning, we started with ClamAV[1], but eventually bought a... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Supabase Storage: now supports the S3 protocol
    Resumable uploads are powered by the TUS protocol. The journey to get here was immensely rewarding, working closely with the TUS team. A big shoutout to the maintainers of the TUS protocol, @murderlon and @acconut, for their collaborative approach to open source. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Ask HN: Best modern file transfer/synchronization protocol?
    If it’s one way (that wasn’t quite clear from the requirements to me). Take a look at https://tus.io/. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Introduction to HTTP Multipart
    HTTP/1 requests (uploads in this case) are also separate to some degree (though there are fairly stringent limits on connections per domain iirc which HTTP/2 resolves via the mentioned streams/multiplexing of connections). The problem they have specifically would be that in a single request (form post for example) those uploads will be linear. Solution really boils down to paralellizing the upload, using... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • Supabase Storage v3: Resumable Uploads with support for 50GB files
    Hey hn, supabase ceo here This release introduces a few new features to Supabase Storage: Resumable Uploads , Quality Filters, Next.js support, and WebP support. As a reminder, Supabase Storage is for file storage, not to be confused with Postgres Storage. Resumable Uploads is the biggest update because it means that you can build more resilient apps: your users can continue uploading a file if their internet... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
View more

Upload.js mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Upload.js yet. Tracking of Upload.js recommendations started around Apr 2022.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing tus.io and Upload.js, you can also consider the following products

Uppy - The next open source file uploader for web browsers

AssetPicker - A free, easy to use, cross plattform ready asset or file picker.

CarrierWave - Solution for file uploads for Rails, Sinatra and other Ruby web frameworks.

CloudFlare - Cloudflare is a global network designed to make everything you connect to the Internet secure, private, fast, and reliable.

CloudExplorer - Cloud Explorer is a open-source Amazon S3 client.

Uploadcare - File uploading, media processing & content delivery for modern web apps