turboSMTP VS SMTP

I run an email based service and while I send most email on my own I have been using the following providers for fall-back (for inbox providers that have very strict policies). - https://serversmtp.com/ - https://aws.amazon.com/ses/ I prefer SES for a number of reasons: - The price is about the best you will get. - You can DKIM sign messages yourself if you want (although IIRC they remove the ability to verify... - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago

Https://serversmtp.com/ It is the only one I have used, it offers both SMTP and a REST API of which I have only used REST, at $COMPANY it was valued as "the cheapest working service to send thousands of email/month from a few email address (the usual noreply@xxx.yy)". - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

I will confront it with smtp2go, they look very similar, also in terms of cost smtp.com is 10$ more, but we'll see which one suits us better. Thanks for the suggestion! Source: about 1 year ago

Phplist is free, then you will need to plug that into an SMTP relay like smtp.com or sendgrid.com. Source: over 1 year ago

Let's say I need about 3k emails per day. Is it better to create 3 domains with google workspace or create smpt server and dedicated IP with AWS SES or smtp.com ? Source: over 2 years ago

We push customers to smtp.com or mailjet. Mostly because we can pull data from their respective API's directly into our software. Source: over 2 years ago

Don't abuse ProtonMail for spamming. If you want to spam folks, use dedicated spam services - such as sendgrid, mailjet, smtp.com, Sendinblue, etc, etc. There's a ton of these services who does the spamming in the proper ways. Source: about 3 years ago