Software Alternatives & Reviews

tup VS Earthly

Compare tup VS Earthly and see what are their differences

tup logo tup

Tup is a file-based build system for Linux, OSX, and Windows.

Earthly logo Earthly

Build anything via containers
  • tup Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-14
  • Earthly Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-29

tup videos

The Nitecore TUP Flashlight: The Full Nick Shabazz Review

More videos:

  • Review - Nitecore TUP Review- Best Keychain EDC Flashlight? (1000 Lumens)
  • Review - Nitecore TUP All-Time Favorite EDC Flashlight

Earthly videos

Earthly souls and spirits moon oracle - De Terri Foss - Review ♥️♥️

More videos:

  • Review - Special Valentine's Day Review - Earthly Body EDIBLE Massage Products! Vegan and CF!
  • Review - Earthly Touches Review

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to tup and Earthly)
Continuous Integration
31 31%
69% 69
Front End Package Manager
DevOps Tools
32 32%
68% 68
Continuous Deployment
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using tup and Earthly. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Earthly should be more popular than tup. It has been mentiond 47 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

tup mentions (19)

  • Show HN: Hancho – A simple and pleasant build system in ~500 lines of Python
    Whenever looking at one these, I think back to the obscure but interesting "tup": “How is it so awesome? In a typical build system, the dependency arrows go down. Although this is the way they would naturally go due to gravity, it is unfortunately also where the enemy's gate is. This makes it very inefficient and unfriendly. In tup, the arrows go up.” https://gittup.org/tup/. - Source: Hacker News / 2 months ago
  • Mazzle – A Pipelines as Code Tool
    Once upon a time, you could roll your own of this using `tup` which might have my favorite "how it works" in the readme: How is it so awesome? In a typical build system, the dependency arrows go down. Although this is the way they would naturally go due to gravity, it is unfortunately also where the enemy's gate is. This makes it very inefficient and unfriendly. In tup, the arrows go up. This is... - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • What should I use to take notes in college?
    Ten years ago, I used reStructuredText and its support for LaTeX math and syntax highlighting. I used tup (tup monitor -a -f) to take care of running rst2html on save. Source: 11 months ago
  • Knit: Making a Better Make
    The dependency resolution is core to https://gittup.org/tup/ which had been adopted a bit at the time it came out but since faded back into obscurity. - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • Buck2: Our open source build system
    I might be showing my ignorance here, but this just sounds like Tup? https://gittup.org/tup/. Source: about 1 year ago
View more

Earthly mentions (47)

  • I stopped worrying and loved Makefiles
    Make is excellent if you use it properly to model your dependencies. This works really well for languages like C/C++, but I think Make really struggles with languages like Go, JavaScript, and Python or when your using a large combination of technologies. I've found Earthly [0] to be the _perfect_ tool to replace Make. It's a familiar syntax (combination of Dockerfiles + Makefiles). Every target is run in an... - Source: Hacker News / 7 days ago
  • Cache is King: A guide for Docker layer caching in GitHub Actions
    Earthly solves this really well: https://earthly.dev They rethink Dockerfiles with really good caching support. - Source: Hacker News / 28 days ago
  • Ask HN: What Underrated Open Source Project Deserves More Recognition?
    Earthly https://earthly.dev/ Fast, consistent builds with an instantly familiar syntax – like Dockerfile and Makefile had a baby. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago
  • Streamlining CI/CD Pipelines with Code: A Developer's Guide
    We are big fans of https://earthly.dev/! Although we haven't personally used Dagger, Earthly has solved our multi-service integration testing problem with elegance. Simple builds + caching baked in. - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • macOS Containers v0.0.1
    This one is ridiculous. This should already exist. Until GitHub builds it, you can use GitHub Actions to kick your builds off but run them remotely on Earthly Cloud (https://earthly.dev/). Even the free tier includes arm64 remote runners. Note: I work at Earthly, but I'm not wrong about this being a good, free, arm64-native workflow for GitHub Actions. - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing tup and Earthly, you can also consider the following products

GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development

Gradle - Accelerate developer productivity. Gradle helps teams build, automate and deliver better software, faster. DocsExplore the documentation of Gradle. Find installation ..

Travis CI - Focus on writing code. Let Travis CI take care of running your tests and deploying your apps.

CMake - CMake is an open-source, cross-platform family of tools designed to build, test and package software.

CircleCI - CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.