tunnelto.dev VS Warp

Https://tunnelto.dev is my preference as it’s very reasonably priced. Source: 11 months ago

So in the end, for those interested with the same issue (How to forward ports behind the Starlink CGNAT), all the VPN providers I tried were bad (the IP they allow to open weren't working well, or they only provide dynamic IPs), so in the end I : 1/ bought a small router on Amazon, the GL-MT1300 (by GL-iNet) but their smaller routers should work too:... Source: over 1 year ago

This sounds a lot like https://tunnelto.dev/, which I've used and generally like. I'm not knowledgeable enough to know what, if any, the differences are, though. - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago

FWIW there is already a similar program (reverse proxy / nat traverser) in Rust: tunnelto. They don't provide bench infos though. Source: over 2 years ago

In addition to ISPC, some of this is also done in software fallback implementations of GPU APIs. In the open source world we have SwiftShader and Lavapipe, and on Windows we have WARP[1]. It's sad to me that Larrabee didn't catch on, as that might have been a path to a good parallel computer, one that has efficient parallel throughput like a GPU, but also agility more like a CPU, so you don't need to batch things... - Source: Hacker News / 7 months ago

If you select a WARP driver it should "theoretically work". But there are some limits with the WARP devices (https://learn.microsoft.com/en-us/windows/win32/direct3darticles/directx-warp). Source: over 1 year ago

If you use D3D11 or D3D12, those come with a software rasterizer by default so you can do graphics programming even without a GPU. It's called WARP and it's what Windows uses to e.g. Render the desktop and stuff before you install your graphics drivers. Source: almost 2 years ago