TrueOS VS NetBSD

Compare TrueOS VS NetBSD and see what are their differences

LibHunt

LibHunt tracks mentions of software libraries on relevant social networks. Based on that data, you can find the most popular projects and their alternatives. featured

Contents:

» Base Details
» Videos
» Reviews
» Alternatives

NetBSD

PowerPC, Alpha, SPARC, MIPS, SH3, ARM, amd64, i386, m68k, VAX: Of course it runs NetBSD.

Landing page //
2019-07-23

Landing page //
2023-08-03

TrueOS

Website: pcbsd.org
$ Details: -

Edit details

NetBSD

Website: netbsd.org
$ Details

Edit details

TrueOS features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

NetBSD features and specs

Portability
NetBSD is known for its high portability across different hardware platforms. It supports a wide range of architectures, making it a versatile choice for various types of systems.
Clean Design
The operating system is praised for its clean and well-documented codebase, which makes it easier to understand, maintain, and contribute to the development.
Security
NetBSD places a strong emphasis on security, implementing robust security features and frequent updates to maintain a secure environment.
Lightweight
It is designed to be lightweight and efficient, which is beneficial for systems with limited resources, such as embedded devices.
Advanced Networking
NetBSD provides advanced networking capabilities, making it suitable for use in network appliances and services.

Possible disadvantages of NetBSD

Smaller Community
Compared to other open-source operating systems like Linux, NetBSD has a smaller community, which can result in less frequent updates and fewer available resources or support.
Less Software
NetBSD may have fewer pre-compiled packages and software options available in its repositories compared to more popular operating systems.
Learning Curve
For users not familiar with BSD systems, there might be a steeper learning curve due to differences in system management and command-line interfaces.
Limited Commercial Support
There are fewer commercial support options available for NetBSD, which may be a limitation for businesses requiring extensive professional support.
Desktop Environment
NetBSD is not traditionally focused on providing a user-friendly desktop environment, which might limit its appeal to casual desktop users.

TrueOS videos

+ Add

TrueOS: Linux or Windows Alternative

NetBSD videos

+ Add

A FreeBSD User Tries Out....NetBSD 8.0

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to TrueOS and NetBSD)

NetBSD

Operating Systems

32 32%

Operating Systems

68% 68

Linux

29 29%

Linux

71% 71

Linux Distribution

34 34%

Linux Distribution

66% 66

Open Source

100 100%

Open Source

0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using TrueOS and NetBSD. For example, how are they different and which one is better?

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, NetBSD seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 3 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

TrueOS mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of TrueOS yet. Tracking of TrueOS recommendations started around Mar 2021.

NetBSD mentions (3)

Shit they exist
The idea of config files is fine, it's the implementation I don't like. I was using NetBSD recently for my senior project and found it fine to use - all the documentation is in one place (well, two - the manpages and netbsd.org). It's when the documentation is nonexistent and you have to search through a million different websites and forum posts to find the one line you have to change - that's what gets me. Linus... Source: over 2 years ago
Redox OS 0.7.0
This is what most of the existing open source operating systems are and it is much easier to contribute to those or fork one that does most of what you want. If you are aiming at a POSIX system then there is a fair amount of work but you at least then get a huge amount of already written software that you can run (IIUC Redox is aiming for this but written in Rust). A structure like Qubes OS would make it easier... - Source: Hacker News / about 3 years ago
Vulnerabilities in billions of Wi-Fi devices let hackers bypass firewalls
It looks like one of the vulnerabilities involves being able to sneak in a rogue ICMPv6 route advertisement, with rogue DNS entries. It also mentions doing this kind of stuff against NetBSD 7.1, but that's a couple of versions old, so I guess they were concerned about all the random managed access points floating around? Source: almost 4 years ago