Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

TrackJS VS Apache Cassandra

Compare TrackJS VS Apache Cassandra and see what are their differences

NinjaOne
NinjaOne (Formerly NinjaRMM) provides remote monitoring and management software that combines powerful functionality with a fast, modern UI. Easily remediate IT issues, automate common tasks, and support end-users with powerful IT management tools. featured
Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

TrackJS logo TrackJS

JavaScript Error Tracking for Modern Web Applications

Apache Cassandra logo Apache Cassandra

The Apache Cassandra database is the right choice when you need scalability and high availability without compromising performance.
  • TrackJS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-07-27
  • Apache Cassandra Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-04-17

TrackJS features and specs

  • Real-time Error Tracking
    TrackJS provides real-time monitoring and alerting of JavaScript errors, allowing developers to quickly identify and address issues as they occur in live environments.
  • Detailed Error Reports
    The service offers comprehensive error reports with detailed stack traces and metadata, helping developers understand the context of errors for more efficient debugging.
  • User-friendly Interface
    TrackJS features an intuitive and easy-to-navigate dashboard, making it accessible even for developers who may not be familiar with error tracking tools.
  • Integrations
    The platform supports various integrations with popular development tools and services such as Slack, GitHub, and Jira, enabling seamless workflow enhancements.
  • Performance Impact
    TrackJS is designed to have minimal performance impact on your application, ensuring that error tracking does not degrade user experience.

Possible disadvantages of TrackJS

  • Pricing
    TrackJS may be considered expensive for smaller teams or projects, as the cost can add up depending on the level of service required.
  • Customization
    While TrackJS provides a robust set of features out-of-the-box, it may lack the level of customization or flexibility needed for specific use cases or complex applications.
  • Limited Free Tier
    The free tier of TrackJS may have limitations in terms of features and data usage, which could be restrictive for some users looking for a more comprehensive solution.
  • Dependency on External Service
    Using TrackJS introduces a dependency on an external service for error tracking, which could be a concern for organizations with strict data policies or those preferring self-hosted solutions.

Apache Cassandra features and specs

  • Scalability
    Apache Cassandra is designed for linear scalability and can handle large volumes of data across many commodity servers without a single point of failure.
  • High Availability
    Cassandra ensures high availability by replicating data across multiple nodes. Even if some nodes fail, the system remains operational.
  • Performance
    It provides fast writes and reads by using a peer-to-peer architecture, making it highly suitable for applications requiring quick data access.
  • Flexible Data Model
    Cassandra supports a flexible schema, allowing users to add new columns to a table at any time, making it adaptable for various use cases.
  • Geographical Distribution
    Data can be distributed across multiple data centers, ensuring low-latency access for geographically distributed users.
  • No Single Point of Failure
    Its decentralized nature ensures there is no single point of failure, which enhances resilience and fault-tolerance.

Possible disadvantages of Apache Cassandra

  • Complexity
    Managing and configuring Cassandra can be complex, requiring specialized knowledge and skills for optimal performance.
  • Eventual Consistency
    Cassandra follows an eventual consistency model, meaning that there might be a delay before all nodes have the latest data, which may not be suitable for all use cases.
  • Write-heavy Operations
    Although Cassandra handles writes efficiently, write-heavy workloads can lead to compaction issues and increased read latency.
  • Limited Query Capabilities
    Cassandra's query capabilities are relatively limited compared to traditional RDBMS, lacking support for complex joins and aggregations.
  • Maintenance Overhead
    Regular maintenance tasks such as node repair and compaction are necessary to ensure optimal performance, adding to the administrative overhead.
  • Tooling and Ecosystem
    While the ecosystem for Cassandra is growing, it is still not as extensive or mature as those for some other database technologies.

TrackJS videos

+ Add

Redux TrackJS Logger

Apache Cassandra videos

+ Add

Course Intro | DS101: Introduction to Apache Cassandra™

More videos:

  • Review - Introduction to Apache Cassandra™

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to TrackJS and Apache Cassandra)

TrackJS

Apache Cassandra

Error Tracking
100 100%
Error Tracking
0% 0
Databases
0 0%
Databases
100% 100
Exception Monitoring
100 100%
Exception Monitoring
0% 0
NoSQL Databases
0 0%
NoSQL Databases
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using TrackJS and Apache Cassandra. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare TrackJS and Apache Cassandra

TrackJS Reviews

We have no reviews of TrackJS yet.
Be the first one to post

Apache Cassandra Reviews

16 Top Big Data Analytics Tools You Should Know About
Application Areas: If you want to work with SQL-like data types on a No-SQL database, Cassandra is a good choice. It is a popular pick in the IoT, fraud detection applications, recommendation engines, product catalogs and playlists, and messaging applications, providing fast real-time insights.
Source: www.analytixlabs.co.in
9 Best MongoDB alternatives in 2019
The Apache Cassandra is an ideal choice for you if you want scalability and high availability without affecting its performance. This MongoDB alternative tool offers support for replicating across multiple datacenters.
Source: www.guru99.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Apache Cassandra seems to be a lot more popular than TrackJS. While we know about 44 links to Apache Cassandra, we've tracked only 1 mention of TrackJS. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

TrackJS mentions (1)

  • First 6 months with eBay/Adevinta
    Holding a hand on a pulse of metrics for errors;. - Source: dev.to / over 2 years ago

Apache Cassandra mentions (44)

  • Why You Shouldn’t Invest In Vector Databases?
    In fact, even in the absence of these commercial databases, users can effortlessly install PostgreSQL and leverage its built-in pgvector functionality for vector search. PostgreSQL stands as the benchmark in the realm of open-source databases, offering comprehensive support across various domains of database management. It excels in transaction processing (e.g., CockroachDB), online analytics (e.g., DuckDB),... - Source: dev.to / 19 days ago
  • Data integrity in Ably Pub/Sub
    All messages are persisted durably for two minutes, but Pub/Sub channels can be configured to persist messages for longer periods of time using the persisted messages feature. Persisted messages are additionally written to Cassandra. Multiple copies of the message are stored in a quorum of globally-distributed Cassandra nodes. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago
  • Which Database is Perfect for You? A Comprehensive Guide to MySQL, PostgreSQL, NoSQL, and More
    Cassandra is a highly scalable, distributed NoSQL database designed to handle large amounts of data across many commodity servers without a single point of failure. - Source: dev.to / 11 months ago
  • Consistent Hashing: An Overview and Implementation in Golang
    Distributed storage Distributed storage systems like Cassandra, DynamoDB, and Voldemort also use consistent hashing. In these systems, data is partitioned across many servers. Consistent hashing is used to map data to the servers that store the data. When new servers are added or removed, consistent hashing minimizes the amount of data that needs to be remapped to different servers. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Understanding SQL vs. NoSQL Databases: A Beginner's Guide
    On the other hand, NoSQL databases are non-relational databases. They store data in flexible, JSON-like documents, key-value pairs, or wide-column stores. Examples include MongoDB, Couchbase, and Cassandra. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing TrackJS and Apache Cassandra, you can also consider the following products

Sentry.io - From error tracking to performance monitoring, developers can see what actually matters, solve quicker, and learn continuously about their applications - from the frontend to the backend.

Redis - Redis is an open source in-memory data structure project implementing a distributed, in-memory key-value database with optional durability.

Rollbar - Rollbar collects errors that happen in your application, notifies you, and analyzes them so you can debug and fix them. Ruby, Python, PHP, Node.js, JavaScript, and Flash libraries available.

MongoDB - MongoDB (from "humongous") is a scalable, high-performance NoSQL database.

BugSnag - Not all bugs are worth fixing. Prioritize and fix software bugs that matter while improving software stability with every release.

ArangoDB - A distributed open-source database with a flexible data model for documents, graphs, and key-values.

Loading...