Toxiproxy VS Google Test

I've used toxiproxy [1] to imitate various network problems (slowness, lost packets, dropping connections, etc). It works pretty well, and is even amenable to running during functional / integration tests. [1]: https://github.com/shopify/toxiproxy. - Source: Hacker News / over 2 years ago

Https://github.com/shopify/toxiproxy exists for this purpose and is quite good. Source: almost 3 years ago

Roy's project uses Google Test, a C++ testing framework. His testing setup is similar to mine as we both keep source files in one directory and tests in another. The key difference is that I can run the tests using the Visual Studios run button. It was fairly easy to write the new tests as there were existing ones that I could reference to check the syntax! - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago

One popular C++ Testing Framework is Google Test, and is what I ended up using. - Source: dev.to / 6 months ago

Not sure about CppUnit but I can speak to my previous experience using the googletest framework which compiles your tests to an executable, and since it's a very simple framework we were able to cross-compile and run directly on our device. We just had to hook up a device to the server that was running the CI so it could flash it when needed. That basically meant that our process was:. Source: 12 months ago

Some C++ unit testing frameworks include googletest, and microsoft's unit testing framework, which doesn't really have a name. Source: about 1 year ago

However, you can use a unit test framework like GoogleTest or Catch2 whic creates a main() function for you which allows you to run single functions, as long as they have been created through some preprocessor macros. Then you can use a VS Code test adapter like this or this which may let you run a single test by right clicking it directly in VS Code. Source: over 1 year ago