Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login
TC

TinyCore VS FreeBSD

Compare TinyCore VS FreeBSD and see what are their differences

LibHunt
LibHunt tracks mentions of software libraries on relevant social networks. Based on that data, you can find the most popular projects and their alternatives. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

TinyCore logo TinyCore

Simple operating system based on Linux that uses "modules", and loads everything into RAM. Can be persistent too.

FreeBSD logo FreeBSD

FreeBSD is an advanced operating system for x86 compatible (including Pentium® and Athlon™)...
Not present
  • FreeBSD Landing page
    Landing page //
    2018-09-29

TinyCore features and specs

  • Lightweight
    TinyCore is extremely lightweight, with the smallest version requiring only 11 MB of disk space, allowing it to run on older hardware with limited resources.
  • Fast Boot Time
    Due to its lightweight nature, TinyCore boots very quickly, often in just a few seconds, providing a snappy and efficient startup process.
  • Modularity
    TinyCore follows a modular approach, allowing users to add only the components they need, which keeps the system lean and efficient.
  • Minimalism
    The minimalistic design of TinyCore helps in focusing on essential applications and services, reducing bloatware commonly found in other distributions.
  • Customizability
    Users have the flexibility to customize their environment extensively, tailoring the operating system to their specific requirements.

Possible disadvantages of TinyCore

  • Steep Learning Curve
    Beginners might find TinyCore challenging to use initially due to its minimalistic approach and need for manual configuration.
  • Limited Applications
    The default base system doesn't include many applications, so users will need to manually download and install additional software.
  • Lack of Standard Features
    Features standard in other distributions, like a full desktop environment, are not present by default and require additional setup.
  • Dependency Management
    Due to its modular approach, managing software dependencies can be cumbersome and prone to errors without careful management.
  • Limited Support Community
    Compared to larger distributions, TinyCore has a smaller user community, which might make finding support and documentation more difficult.

FreeBSD features and specs

  • Stability
    FreeBSD is known for its robustness and reliability, making it a preferred choice for servers and critical applications that require high uptime.
  • Advanced Networking
    It offers advanced networking features and performance, suitable for heavy network-related usage such as routers, firewalls, and servers.
  • ZFS File System
    FreeBSD includes support for the ZFS file system, which provides high data integrity, advanced snapshot capabilities, and efficient data management.
  • Ports Collection
    The FreeBSD Ports Collection offers a vast selection of pre-packaged software that eases the installation of applications and their dependencies.
  • Security Features
    FreeBSD is known for its strong security features, such as jails for process separation and Capsicum, a capability-based security framework.

Possible disadvantages of FreeBSD

  • Hardware Compatibility
    FreeBSD may have limited support for certain hardware devices compared to other operating systems like Windows or Linux.
  • Learning Curve
    The system can be complex for new users, requiring a significant amount of time and effort to become proficient, especially if they are accustomed to more user-friendly environments.
  • Smaller Community
    Compared to Linux, FreeBSD has a smaller user and developer community, which might result in less community-driven support and fewer available resources.
  • Limited Desktop Support
    While FreeBSD can be used on desktop systems, it is primarily optimized for servers and might not offer the same level of convenience or support for desktop applications and environments as Linux distros.
  • Software Availability
    Although it has a vast Ports Collection, some software might not be available or can be more challenging to compile and maintain than on Linux.

Analysis of FreeBSD

Overall verdict

  • Yes, FreeBSD is considered a good operating system, particularly for users seeking stability, security, and high performance. It is highly respected in the open-source community and widely used in various applications, from web hosting to advanced networking solutions.

Why this product is good

  • FreeBSD is well-regarded for its advanced networking, performance, and security features. It offers a robust and flexible system that is ideal for building servers, embedded systems, and desktops. The operating system is known for its strong adherence to UNIX principles, its permissive licensing, and its extensive documentation. Additionally, FreeBSD provides a Ports collection with thousands of applications and a supportive community.

Recommended for

  • System administrators interested in building reliable and secure servers
  • Developers and users who appreciate a UNIX-like environment
  • Organizations seeking customizable and high-performance networking solutions
  • Anyone interested in contributing to or learning from a well-documented open-source project
  • Users who prefer permissive licensing for software redistribution

TinyCore videos

No TinyCore videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

FreeBSD videos

+ Add

FreeBSD 12 Review - Used as my daily OS

More videos:

  • Review - A Look and brief introduction to FreeBSD 12.1
  • Review - I tried FreeBSD! - here's what I think of it

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to TinyCore and FreeBSD)

TinyCore

FreeBSD

OS & Utilities
100 100%
OS & Utilities
0% 0
Linux
15 15%
Linux
85% 85
System & Hardware
100 100%
System & Hardware
0% 0
Operating Systems
0 0%
Operating Systems
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using TinyCore and FreeBSD. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare TinyCore and FreeBSD

TinyCore Reviews

We have no reviews of TinyCore yet.
Be the first one to post

FreeBSD Reviews

Best free Linux router and firewall distributions of 2023
OpenBSD and FreeBSD are actively developed and are very capable, but these systems require a high level of understanding of operating system internals and low-level networking to be used as routers.
Source: teklager.se
Avoid The Hack: 11 Best Privacy Friendly Operating Systems (Desktops)
With "Linuxulator," FreeBSD has compatibility with Linux binaries. Linuxulator can run unmodified Linux binaries without using virtual machines or emulation. Additionally, FreeBSD has tens of thousands ported libraries and applications.
Source: avoidthehack.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, FreeBSD seems to be a lot more popular than TinyCore. While we know about 21 links to FreeBSD, we've tracked only 1 mention of TinyCore. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

TinyCore mentions (1)

  • please help me how do i install sudo apt
    "core only" from https://distro.ibiblio.org/tinycorelinux/downloads.html. Source: over 3 years ago

FreeBSD mentions (21)

  • I've never used FreeBSD and have some questions
    Aside from being UNIX based, what similarities does it share with Linux? Both have monolithic kernels. Source based build systems are offered (ports, which are like the portage system on Gentoo) as well as binary build systems (pkg, which is like apt, yum, pacman, etc.) Both offer a lot of free software, though more licenses are compatible with FreeBSD like CDDL, which is not compatible Linux. Both let you... Source: over 1 year ago
  • FreeBSD turns 30 today!
    There's no mention of a birthday on their site, and its footer says 1995-2023. That must be just the site, because Wikipedia tells me FreeBSD's initial release was indeed, but not quite, 30 years ago, November 1st 1993. Still no birthday. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Computer
    I'm not the right person to ask this -- I just run it on whatever I happen to have. But I think sleep and wifi (for example) have issues with different hardware, so you'd have to do your homework. The FreeBSD handbook on freebsd.org is always very helpful to me. You can try it out with a live cd / thumbdrive to see how much supported hardware you've got. My Lenovo X1 from a couple years ago works for what I... Source: about 2 years ago
  • Can SGI’s Enthusiast Community Bring IRIX Back to Life?
    People are still actively working on Illumos. The last change was yesterday morning. * https://illumos.org People are still actively working on MirBSD. There's a CVS commit account that can be followed on the FediVerse. * http://www.mirbsd.org It's DragonFly BSD, not Dragon BSD, and the irony of that is that you missed FreeBSD, which is of course still going. * https://dragonflybsd.org * https://freebsd.org As... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 years ago
  • X220 and beer. A lovely combo, especially with FreeBSD.
    A open source free and stable Unix-like operating system. Read more at http://freebsd.org. Source: about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing TinyCore and FreeBSD, you can also consider the following products

DietPi - Dietpi is a debian based operative system made to install new apps easyer.

Ubuntu - Ubuntu is a Debian Linux-based open source operating system for desktop computers.

FatDog64 - FatDog64 is the lightweight 64-bit multi-user Linux distribution.

Linux Mint - Linux Mint is one of the most popular desktop Linux distributions and used by millions of people.

Porteus - Learn how to install Porteus, about Porteus modules and getting porteus to work with wifi internet.

Debian - Debian is a free distribution of the GNU/Linux operating system.

Loading...