Times Newer Roman VS Dank Mono

If it is for writing essays, https://timesnewerroman.com/ here you go. Source: 5 months ago

I don’t think so because the critique is not of the font. Something like Times Newer Roman[0] might fall into that category? (Fair use is notoriously fuzzy and misunderstood, and I am no exception.) [0]: https://timesnewerroman.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago

Cough cough Times Newer Roman & submit as a PDF *cough cough * …use at your own risk. Source: 12 months ago

You could always experiment with narrower serifed fonts, to contrast with your headline fonts. Try pairing the Didone you're using for the headlines, with a font like Loretta, which might be more suited to body text than Caslon. However if your intention is for the Didone and the body text font to match in styles, a good idea is to look for decent body text suitable serifed fonts that match the somewhat round... Source: about 1 year ago

Yep! So the way this works is the company does biweekly/weekly drops. Each drop is different, most are some sort of product. Some of the early drops were free to use and didn't cost anything. Like Times Newer Roman, a font that looked like the standard Times, but had more space between the letters to make your pages fill up faster. That drop is still available. Last drop was Illegal Chips, where they had chips... Source: over 2 years ago

Dank mono annoys me except in one spot - conference presentation slides (where it still annoys me, but I can see it being useful). The italics as cursive is annoying - especially with the 's' that shows up in too many places. However, the difficulty of distinguishing italics from regular on a presentation I can mostly forgive it since I can now recognize the italics and that hint to whatever it is trying... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago

For programming and code blocks on my blog I use Dank. Source: over 1 year ago