Software Alternatives & Reviews

Thomson Reuters VS PubMed.gov

Compare Thomson Reuters VS PubMed.gov and see what are their differences

Thomson Reuters logo Thomson Reuters

The intelligence, technology and human expertise you need to find trusted answers. Thomson Reuters is The Answer Company.

PubMed.gov logo PubMed.gov

PubMed comprises more than 29 million citations for biomedical literature from MEDLINE, life science journals, and online books. Citations may include links to full-text content from PubMed Central and publisher web sites.
  • Thomson Reuters Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-19
  • PubMed.gov Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-25

Thomson Reuters videos

Thomson Reuters Employee Reviews - Q3 2018

More videos:

  • Review - Thomson Reuters eDiscovery Point Video Review
  • Review - Thomson Reuters StockReports+: The report explained by Bala Ilango

PubMed.gov videos

PubMed.gov Protandim Peer-Reviewed Research

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Thomson Reuters and PubMed.gov)
Accounting & Finance
100 100%
0% 0
Research Tools
0 0%
100% 100
Taxes
100 100%
0% 0
Mockups
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Thomson Reuters and PubMed.gov. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Thomson Reuters and PubMed.gov

Thomson Reuters Reviews

Citation Management Tools - Alternatives to EndNote
Many are familiar with EndNote as a helpful citation management tool that assists with collecting, saving, and citing papers. But sometimes EndNote can feel somewhat cumbersome to use. If you are on the market for a new citation manager, you might want to try out these other options.

PubMed.gov Reviews

We have no reviews of PubMed.gov yet.
Be the first one to post

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, PubMed.gov seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 563 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Thomson Reuters mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Thomson Reuters yet. Tracking of Thomson Reuters recommendations started around Mar 2021.

PubMed.gov mentions (563)

  • Large language models (e.g., ChatGPT) as research assistants
    Yes, the actual results are definitely not as impressive as the overly hyped headlines, but there's still a lot. First off, in terms of research building up on top of it, as of today, Pubmed shows 9,364 articles citing their 2021 paper, and Google Scholar shows 21,719 results as a whole[1], but these include non-biomedical papers (e.g. Applications of similar ML models to other disciplines). As for actual... - Source: Hacker News / 10 days ago
  • A junk food diet can cause long-term damage to adolescent brains
    An unhealthy diet (i.e., nutrient deficient diet) harms adult brains. Unsurprising. To learn more, search for resources on pubmed. https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/. - Source: Hacker News / 19 days ago
  • Text Processing Practice Experiment: 20 SERP Types to SQLite yy084
    Curl -si04A "" "https://pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/?term=$x&sort=&page=${1-1}". - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago
  • A genetically modified bacterium that outcompetes bacteria causing tooth decay
    Any thoughts on these folks (they are your direct competitor)? https://probiorahealth.com/product/probiora/ A decade or so ago, their founder started with genetically modified bacteria that supposedly outcompete wildtype strains. The regulators responded in the only sane way possible, and it didn't go to human trials, from what I can tell. List of publications from their founder:... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • Is Füm safe??
    This link is to PubMed, a search engine that indexes published science articles and studies. Although close to some author's names, I tried a quick search of Füm vaping but came up empty. Maybe you'll have better luck. I'd just ask one question. With zero tastebuds inside human lungs, what's the logic of inhaling nicotine-free vapor into your lungs? If going for taste, why not hold the vape in your mouth... Source: 5 months ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Thomson Reuters and PubMed.gov, you can also consider the following products

Mendeley - Easily organize your papers, read & annotate your PDFs, collaborate in private or open groups, and securely access your research from everywhere.

Google Scholar - Google Scholar is a freely accessible web search engine that indexes the full text of scholarly...

Qiqqa - Qiqqa is a free research and reference management software. It can be used in many organizational projects from the academic to the personal to the business endeavor. Read more about Qiqqa.

SCI-HUB - It provides mass and public access to tens of millions of research papers

Tax990 - Tax 990 is an IRS-authorized e-filing solution for nonprofit organizations that helps clients understand the process of filing 990 series returns.

Paperpile - Clean and simple and reference management for the web. Sync your PDFs to Google Drive and cite your papers in Google Docs.