The website https://thispersondoesnotexist.com/ has been mentioned a few times on HN; is there a voice equivalent to this concept? The question came to mind when we were evaluating an AI multilingual, voice-over service and someone asked about indemnification from copyright claims (eg: if this service used a voice that sounded too much like Scarlet Johanssen, for example). Surely there are purely AI voices out... - Source: Hacker News / 19 days ago

I'm sure there will be plenty of new individual writers for you to follow, like this one [0], or this one [1], or this one [2]. 0: https://thispersondoesnotexist.com/ 1: https://thispersondoesnotexist.com/ 2: https://thispersondoesnotexist.com/. - Source: Hacker News / 3 months ago

I wonder if we will ever get a realism model which can produce normal faces like https://thispersondoesnotexist.com instead of like super symmetrical faces of models. Source: 6 months ago

This has been in circulation since a while AI images took off, and they certainly weren't convincing before they did. You know the old "try to name one thing in this image" macro? Pretty sure that was AI generated, there was also thispersondoesnotexist.com which was always pretty good but of course it is. Source: 6 months ago

Not the workflow for these images, but if you easily want to spice up your gens with a bit more natural look, try using images from thispersondoesnotexist.com with IPAdapter face model. Source: 6 months ago

Along with alphanumeric characters, African click sounds, mathematical and geometric symbols, dingbats, and computer control sequences, emojis can be represented as Unicode characters, making them computer-readable. Unlike alphanumeric characters and other symbols, however, emojis are maintained by the Unicode Consortium. The consortium solicits proposals for new emojis, and regularly selects which emojis will be... - Source: dev.to / 5 months ago

ASCII isn't the only encoding method. You're looking at unicode characters, which can be expressed as numbers just like ASCII characters based on the encoding system . More to your point, if you were already in the mozilla documentation, why didn't you just read their explanation of how it's handled? Source: about 1 year ago

They are simply unicode characters. Https://home.unicode.org/ Try it in VS Code. Yes, an Emoji is valid in JS. Different browsers render the emojis differently though. Source: about 1 year ago

When you refer to something as an “Emoji” you indicate that they’re apart of the Unicode language. What Reddit is doing is not considered apart of unicode therefore not technically an “Emoji”, instead it’s just a plain old image used in text format. Source: over 1 year ago

For almost any character that needs to be added to computers globally, you go to bug Unicode and they may add it to a new version of the UTF standard. From there people who make relevant software will gradually adopt it. Source: over 1 year ago