The Unlicense VS Open Access Button

It's theoretically helpful to at least put in a no-warranties clause. But sqlite as maybe the most popular public domain project worldwide doesn't (instead having a blessing). I mostly settled on the Unlicense https://unlicense.org/ over just saying 'public domain' or 'CC0' as a simple text blob to paste in, and in the event of a significant contribution from someone else, there's a simple text blurb to ask them... - Source: Hacker News / about 2 months ago

No, you're confused, because this is confusing: https://unlicense.org/ https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Unlicense So if something is unlicensed (no license) you would be correct, but if something is unlicensed (unlicensed licence) you would be incorrect.. - Source: Hacker News / 4 months ago

CC0[0] would be the obvious one; spicier and less legalese alternatives that nonetheless amount to about the same thing include the Unlicense[1] and the Do What the Fuck You Want License[2] [0] https://creativecommons.org/share-your-work/public-domain/cc0/ [1] https://unlicense.org/ with some philosophical discussion at https://ar.to/2010/01/set-your-code-free [2] http://www.wtfpl.net/. - Source: Hacker News / 11 months ago

Interesting, looks like the Open Source Initiative decided to pull their endorsement of CC0 over the same clause. Apparently OSI decided to approve Unilicense as a public-domain equivalent license. Source: over 1 year ago

So its licensed on github under the Unlicenced License which TL:DR means anyone can modify it and publish it for any reason. Besides, I don't think a single line of code from the original FT UI mod is in my FT UI mod. At that point if you still consider it stealing, I don't know what to tell it, it only changes a single byte of code. Source: over 1 year ago

Try instead openaccessbutton.org or e-mail authors directly. Source: 12 months ago

You may also want to check out the Open Access Button. https://openaccessbutton.org/. Source: about 1 year ago

There are browser add-ons that can help with the same, such as the OA button or Unpaywall, though Google Scholar is slightly better (for now) given that they cast a wider net. Source: almost 2 years ago

I've seen some other Sci-Hub extensions, most notably https://openaccessbutton.org/. However most of these require you to go to the article page, then click the extension's button to finally be redirected. I thought I could do better. Source: about 2 years ago

Have you tried open access button for individual articles? It's not perfect and can be really hit-or-miss, but if there's a (legal!) free version out there, it's pretty good at finding it. Source: about 2 years ago