I’ve had the pdf of “Almost Perfect” by Pete Peterson [0] on my cloud for a while and like reading it in bits and pieces and rereading it when I’m stuck somewhere without data. It’s the story of WordPerfect and while desktop software is very different than today’s software the organizational dynamics is fascinating to me. And I like how what to me is a very technical thing- writing excellent software- is designed... - Source: Hacker News / 9 months ago

Our brains are tools. We are using our own, and people around us are using theirs. We should get to learn more about our brains and how to use ours together. So: Bad arguments, fallacies and other biases. Once these are a common understanding, you can enter into constructive investigation and dialogue about Science, History, Politics, etc. Source: 12 months ago

Here. You are featured on almost every page. Cheers. Source: about 1 year ago

This is also a good start: https://bookofbadarguments.com/. Source: about 1 year ago

As someone who is often disliked because of my attention to the truth, I would highly recommend getting a copy of https://bookofbadarguments.com/ -- people will already dislike you for pointing out their wrong, the least you can do is have fun with it IMO. Source: over 1 year ago

Don't listen to them. What you are doing is very anti-polarisation. In a polarised society, you will have a lot of disbelievers in you. Don't listen to them. To make any convincing argument, you have to put it through the scrutiny of multiple arguments in all sides. Climate deniers are not climate deniers because they run away from truth, they are because they think they found THE truth. If their arguments can be... Source: over 1 year ago

Kialo.com is better for real debate. There you could cite your study, and people could discuss why it does-or-doesn't apply to this-or-that population, and any name-calling, or maligning someone's attitude, would be deleted with explanation and invitation to rephrase. Source: over 1 year ago

Should check out https://kialo.com . Best site for forming a healthy debate. Source: almost 2 years ago

I read it and it looks like they studied r/TheRedPill, r/DatingAdvice, r/Atheism, and r/TheDonald, but I don't see where it suggests the results might apply to subreddits such as r/religion or other discussion platforms such as kialo.com. Also, they only seem to have found a small bias in the more neutral subreddit r/DatingAdvice. Source: almost 3 years ago

And about your second suggesting: Yes, I also had something like in mind – and in fact, there is kialo.com already doing it! Source: almost 3 years ago