Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Texture Studio VS Material Maker

Compare Texture Studio VS Material Maker and see what are their differences

RealityMAX
RealityMAX is the AI-powered 3D design collaboration platform, 100% online. Cooperate remotely with your colleagues on 3D projects and easily share your work with clients. Create Web3D and AR experiences in a snap, without a line of code. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Texture Studio logo Texture Studio

Texture Studio is all you need to produce professional quality textures for use in games and tiled...

Material Maker logo Material Maker

Cross-platform, procedural texture generation tool.
  • Texture Studio Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-08
  • Material Maker Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-09-28

Texture Studio features and specs

  • User-Friendly Interface
    Texture Studio is designed with a straightforward and intuitive interface, making it accessible for new users and efficient for experienced ones.
  • Comprehensive Toolset
    The software offers a wide range of tools for creating and editing textures, which can be beneficial for complex projects.
  • Customizable Features
    Users have the ability to customize many aspects of the program to fit their specific needs, enhancing work efficiency.
  • Community Support
    Being part of the BlitzBasic community means users can access community support and shared resources, which can be valuable for troubleshooting and learning.

Possible disadvantages of Texture Studio

  • Limited Updates
    Texture Studio may not receive frequent updates, which could limit new features or improvements in the long run.
  • Compatibility Issues
    Users might face compatibility issues with newer systems or software due to its age or lack of recent updates.
  • Learning Curve
    While it's user-friendly, mastering all the features of Texture Studio can require some time and effort.
  • Community Dependency
    Relying on community support can mean slower assistance and a varying degree of help quality.

Material Maker features and specs

  • Free and Open Source
    Material Maker is available for free and is open source, allowing users to modify and contribute to the software, making it accessible to a wide range of users without financial barriers.
  • Node-Based Workflow
    The software provides a node-based workflow which allows for ease of use and powerful procedural texturing, making it simple for users to create complex materials efficiently.
  • Integration with Godot Engine
    Material Maker integrates well with the Godot Engine, facilitating smooth workflows for game developers who use this popular open-source game engine.
  • Community Support
    A growing community of users contributes to the sharing of tips, resources, and materials, providing a supportive environment for learning and expanding skills.
  • Cross-Platform
    Material Maker is available on multiple platforms, including Windows, MacOS, and Linux, offering flexibility for users across different operating systems.

Possible disadvantages of Material Maker

  • Steep Learning Curve
    While powerful, the node-based system can be complex for beginners, requiring a significant investment of time to become proficient.
  • Limited Documentation
    The available documentation can be sparse, potentially leading to challenges in understanding all features and tools available in the software.
  • Performance Issues on Large Projects
    Some users have reported performance slowdowns when working on larger or more complex projects, which can hinder workflow efficiency.
  • Less Polished Interface
    Compared to commercial alternatives, Material Maker may have a less polished UI, which might impact the user experience.
  • Limited Features Compared to Paid Tools
    Material Maker may lack some advanced features offered by commercial texturing software, which could be a limitation for professional users seeking specific capabilities.

Analysis of Material Maker

Overall verdict

  • Overall, Material Maker is considered a good tool, especially for those looking for a cost-effective solution to create procedural textures. Its features and user-friendly design make it a solid choice for both beginners and experienced users in the field.

Why this product is good

  • Material Maker is a popular tool among 3D artists and game developers for creating procedural textures and materials. It is praised for being open-source and free, making it accessible to a wide audience. Users appreciate its node-based interface, which is similar to other industry-standard software, allowing for a smooth learning curve. The software is also valued for its capability to produce high-quality textures that can be used in various 3D modeling and game development projects. Regular updates and a supportive community contribute to its positive reception.

Recommended for

    Material Maker is recommended for 3D artists, game developers, and hobbyists who are interested in creating procedural materials and textures without incurring high software costs. It is also suitable for educators and students who require an accessible and powerful tool for learning and teaching purposes in digital art and design.

Texture Studio videos

+ Add

Grotti Dealership | Speed Mapping | Texture Studio

More videos:

  • Review - SPEED MAPPINGAN TONGKRONGAN PASBEK || GTA TEXTURE STUDIO

Material Maker videos

+ Add

Material Maker 0.8 Released -- Now with more better!

More videos:

  • Review - Material Maker -- Godot Powered Procedural Texture Creator (Free & Open Source!)
  • Review - Material Maker & Pixelorama -- Godot Powered Open Source GameDev Goodness!

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Texture Studio and Material Maker)

Texture Studio

Material Maker

Design Tools
20 20%
Design Tools
80% 80
3D
14 14%
3D
86% 86
Architecture
12 12%
Architecture
88% 88
Graphic Design Software
29 29%
Graphic Design Software
71% 71

User comments

Share your experience with using Texture Studio and Material Maker. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Material Maker seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 8 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Texture Studio mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Texture Studio yet. Tracking of Texture Studio recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Material Maker mentions (8)

  • Underw[A]ter [OC]
    In a software called material maker, this is the setup(slightly different but this basically just offsets the textures). Source: about 2 years ago
  • Godot showing off a texture I made in material maker
    Did you find it? Here it is if you didn't. It's made in Godot. Source: over 2 years ago
  • How would you go about modeling this?
    “Name your own price” alternative based on the Godot engine https://rodzilla.itch.io/material-maker. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Helmet Hud Test Godot 4 FPS
    Helmet overlay was made using material maker. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Has anyone been able to run Substance Designer on the steam deck?
    No idea about that one but Material Maker works great! Source: about 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Texture Studio and Material Maker, you can also consider the following products

NeoTextureEdit - NeoTextureEdit is an open source (GNU LGPL v.

Substance Designer - Substance Designer is a node-based non-destructive application for material authoring.

TextureLab - Free, Cross-Platform, GPU-Accelerated Procedural Texture Generator.

Pixel AI - AI generated game textures.

PixaFlux - PixaFlux is a node based image processing application.

PixPlant - A complete solution for repeating textures and 3D maps. Save a lot of texturing time with PixPlant!

Loading...