Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Text::Amuse VS DocFX

Compare Text::Amuse VS DocFX and see what are their differences

Text::Amuse logo Text::Amuse

Markup language for AMuseWiki.

DocFX logo DocFX

A documentation generation tool for API reference and Markdown files!
  • Text::Amuse Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-04-23
  • DocFX Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-05-11

Text::Amuse videos

No Text::Amuse videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

+ Add video

DocFX videos

Generate Java documentation with DocFX

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Text::Amuse and DocFX)
Documentation
13 13%
87% 87
Documentation As A Service & Tools
Knowledge Base
0 0%
100% 100
Project Management
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Text::Amuse and DocFX. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, DocFX should be more popular than Text::Amuse. It has been mentiond 7 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Text::Amuse mentions (1)

  • How to import books into The Anarchist Library?
    Amuse markup manual. You can talk to librarians via IRC, there's usually someone online. Source: almost 2 years ago

DocFX mentions (7)

  • TSDocs.dev: type docs for any JavaScript library
    This is a better looking version of what Java and C# have had for a long time (kudos to the author for that!), is that the inspiration for this tool? https://docs.oracle.com/javase/8/docs/technotes/tools/windows/javadoc.html https://dotnet.github.io/docfx/ I saw the author mentioned in another comment that they found themselves peeping inside type declaration files "too often". While I do often use sites generated... - Source: Hacker News / 5 months ago
  • What Does Microsoft Use to Create their KB Articles?
    Actually, we use it for OptiTune, it's called "docfx" https://dotnet.github.io/docfx/. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Library / Codebase Documentation - Multiple aggregated libraries - How to create? DocFx does not support this?
    We would really prefer to use a somewhat generic pre-made tool for this (such as DocFX) compared to rolling our own solution. We can roll our own solution... But would prefer not to so that we can minimize development and maintenance overhead. Source: over 2 years ago
  • CSharp Docuementation Site
    I use docfx from microsoft to generate documentation for all my oss libraries. Source: over 2 years ago
  • What platform is Microsoft Docs hosted on?
    My best guess would be that there's a CI/CD pipeline in GitHub that utilizes DocFX to convert the Markdown files to HTML. The constructed HTML files are then placed in an Azure Storage account that configured for Static Website Hosting combined with Azure CDN. Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Text::Amuse and DocFX, you can also consider the following products

DocBook - DocBook is a schema (available in several languages including RELAX NG, SGML and XML DTDs, and W3C...

Doxygen - Generate documentation from source code

Nots.io - Keep your documentation up-to-date | Nots.io

Docsify.js - A magical documentation site generator.

Groff - The groff (GNU troff) software is a typesetting package which reads plain text mixed with...

Daux.io - Daux.io is a documentation generator that uses a simple folder structure and Markdown files to...