Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

testRigor VS Kobiton

Compare testRigor VS Kobiton and see what are their differences

testRigor logo testRigor

Use plain English to build stable and maintainable functional end-to-end tests.

Kobiton logo Kobiton

Mobile experience platform for manual & automated testing
  • testRigor Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-18
  • Kobiton Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-15

testRigor

$ Details
freemium
Platforms
Browser Android iOS Web Windows Mac OSX Linux Google Chrome iPhone Windows Phone Safari

testRigor videos

Upgrade's Testimonial

More videos:

  • Review - TestRigor discovering new functionality automatically
  • Tutorial - How to use TestRigor to test your website or mobile app
  • Review - Fun with Regular Expressions and testRigor (Part 1 of 2)

Kobiton videos

Your Kobiton Platform Overview

More videos:

  • Review - Impress Your Boss with Scriptless Automation Superpowers I Kobiton
  • Review - Introducing Kobiton with Katalon Studio

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to testRigor and Kobiton)
Automated Testing
51 51%
49% 49
Website Testing
59 59%
41% 41
Online Services
0 0%
100% 100
Browser Testing
59 59%
41% 41

User comments

Share your experience with using testRigor and Kobiton. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare testRigor and Kobiton

testRigor Reviews

We have no reviews of testRigor yet.
Be the first one to post

Kobiton Reviews

Best Automation Testing Tools (Free and Paid) | July 2022
Kobiton’s mobile device testing platform accelerates the testing and delivery of mobile applications by offering live device testing in the cloud. Through their Intelligent Test Automation, a scriptless automation solution, Kobiton enables companies to conduct the extensive, automated real-device testing necessary to create flawless experiences for all users on all devices.

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Kobiton seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

testRigor mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of testRigor yet. Tracking of testRigor recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Kobiton mentions (2)

  • Top HeadSpin Alternatives for Comprehensive Testing
    Kobiton focuses on mobile application testing, providing manual and automated testing capabilities on real devices. It emphasizes performance, usability, and the overall user experience, offering access to the latest smartphones and tablets for testing. - Source: dev.to / 2 months ago
  • Testing
    I came across https://kobiton.com/ and am just wondering if its good for this, or are there any better/similar services for testing across many devices? Source: over 2 years ago

What are some alternatives?

When comparing testRigor and Kobiton, you can also consider the following products

mabl - Low-code Test Automation That Scales

ClickCease - ClickCease is a click fraud detection and protection solution.

Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.

Clixtell - Clixtell is a world leader in providing cutting edge solutions for call tracking & analytics, detecting & preventing Google Ads & Bing Ads click fraud activity and website video recording.

Testim - Stable, self-healing, end-to-end test automation via machine learning. Testim helps accelerate the delivery of high-quality software. Speed up test-authoring and improve the stability of automated, end-to-end tests.

Cypress.io - Slow, difficult and unreliable testing for anything that runs in a browser. Install Cypress in seconds and take the pain out of front-end testing.