Deployment simplifies continuous code integration and delivery automation for startups and agile engineering teams on the AWS cloud, eliminating the need for DevOps engineering. A developer can deploy static sites, web services, and environments without knowledge of AWS or DevOps. Deployment supports previews on pull requests and automatic deployments on code push without manual setup or scripting. It enables engineering teams to focus on tasks that add customer value instead of worrying about DevOps-related grunt work.
No features have been listed yet.
Deployment.io's answer:
I led engineering teams at early-stage startups and realized that startups waste 70% of valuable engineering time on tedious, non-coding tasks that they can easily automate.
To solve this problem, we've built Deployment.io so engineering teams at startups can focus on writing more code that adds value and helps them achieve PMF faster.
Deployment.io's answer:
ReactJs using Typescript, GatsbyJs using Typescript, GoLang, and AWS
Deployment.io's answer:
Deployment.io is built and designed for startups. Our customers can onboard in 5 minutes and start deploying apps to AWS without any DevOps or AWS knowledge. Other platforms are complex and require scripting or DevOps knowledge. They are built for bigger companies with a lot of resources.
Deployment.io's answer:
Startups and agile engineering teams should choose Deployment.io for the simplicity and ease of use. Our competitors are complex and are designed for bigger companies.
Deployment.io's answer:
For startups, speed and focus are crucial. Our primary audience is engineering teams at startups that want to focus on building code that adds value and not on DevOps related grunt work.
Deploying web apps on AWS has never been this easy and it also takes care of scaling based on usage.
Based on our record, TestComplete seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 2 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.
I've been working with Selenium and Python for the past two years and I can say I've good enough experience with them about now. One thing that has always bothered me is how much manual work I have to do in order to implement the steps I need my program to make. So I've been thinking of making my own "step recorder", something in the vein of TestComplete. I've been using PyAutoGui too and the thought of crossing... Source: over 1 year ago
SmartBear TestComplete and Ranorex both offer 30-day free trials to try them out. Their suites make it easy to automate desktop apps, but licensing is expensive. Part of what you pay for is being able to write "codeless" tests by recording your mouse and keyboard activity and validating whatever you want on the app. Source: about 2 years ago
Sauce Labs - Test mobile or web apps instantly across 700+ browser/OS/device platform combinations - without infrastructure setup.
Harness - Automated Tests For Your Web App
Selenium - Selenium automates browsers. That's it! What you do with that power is entirely up to you. Primarily, it is for automating web applications for testing purposes, but is certainly not limited to just that.
Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development
Ranorex Studio - Accelerate testing with Ranorex Studio, the all-in-one tool for test automation. For desktop, web, or mobile app testing, with easy codeless automation tools, a full IDE, robust object recognition, flexible reporting and built-in Selenium WebDriver.
GitHub Actions - Automate your workflow from idea to production