Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Tenable.io VS OWASP Dependency-Track

Compare Tenable.io VS OWASP Dependency-Track and see what are their differences

Tenable.io logo Tenable.io

Tenable.io Cyber Exposure platform helps to protect any asset on any computing platform and eliminate blind spots.

OWASP Dependency-Track logo OWASP Dependency-Track

OWASP Dependency-Track is an intelligent Software Composition Analysis (SCA) platform that allows...
  • Tenable.io Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-06
  • OWASP Dependency-Track Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-02-03

Tenable.io features and specs

  • Comprehensive Vulnerability Coverage
    Tenable.io provides extensive coverage of vulnerabilities across a wide range of IT assets, including on-premise, cloud, and container environments, ensuring thorough security assessments.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The platform features an intuitive and easy-to-use interface, allowing both experienced and novice users to navigate and operate the tool effectively.
  • Advanced Reporting and Analytics
    Tenable.io offers robust reporting and analytics capabilities, enabling users to generate detailed reports and gain insights into their security posture.
  • Scalability
    Designed for scalability, Tenable.io can efficiently handle the needs of both small businesses and large enterprises, adjusting to changing requirements.
  • API Integrations
    The platform includes extensive API support for integrating with other security tools and existing workflows, enhancing overall security infrastructure compatibility and efficiency.

Possible disadvantages of Tenable.io

  • Pricing
    Tenable.io can be expensive compared to some other vulnerability management solutions, which might be a barrier for smaller organizations with limited budgets.
  • Complexity in Deployment
    Initial setup and deployment can be complex, especially for organizations without a dedicated IT security team, potentially requiring professional services for effective implementation.
  • False Positives
    Some users have reported the occurrence of false positives, which can lead to unnecessary remediation efforts and the allocation of resources to non-critical issues.
  • Learning Curve
    Despite its user-friendly interface, there can be a significant learning curve initially, particularly with advanced features and integrations requiring deeper understanding.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running comprehensive scans and analyses can be resource-intensive, potentially impacting system performance, especially on older or less powerful hardware.

OWASP Dependency-Track features and specs

  • Proactive Vulnerability Management
    Dependency-Track allows organizations to proactively identify and mitigate vulnerabilities in their software dependencies. By continuously monitoring and analyzing the components in use, it helps in preventing potential security breaches before they are exploited.
  • Comprehensive Reporting and Analytics
    The tool provides detailed reports and analytics on the security status of an organization's dependencies. This aids in tracking the risk profile over time, making informed decisions, and prioritizing remediation efforts effectively.
  • Integration with CI/CD Pipelines
    Dependency-Track can be seamlessly integrated into continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) pipelines, ensuring that dependencies are automatically assessed for vulnerabilities as part of the software development lifecycle, enhancing security without disrupting development processes.
  • Support for Multiple Package Ecosystems
    Offering support for a wide range of package ecosystems, Dependency-Track can analyze components from various sources, making it versatile and applicable to a broad spectrum of technology stacks used by different organizations.
  • Open Source and Community-Driven
    Being an open-source project, Dependency-Track benefits from community contributions, which enhances its features, security, and reliability over time. It allows users to customize and adapt the tool according to their specific requirements.

Possible disadvantages of OWASP Dependency-Track

  • Complex Setup and Configuration
    The initial setup and configuration of Dependency-Track can be complex and time-consuming, especially for organizations that are new to vulnerability management tools. It may require a steep learning curve for effective use.
  • Resource Intensive
    Running Dependency-Track, particularly in an enterprise environment with many projects and dependencies, can be resource-intensive, requiring significant computational power and storage, which may result in increased operational costs.
  • False Positives and Negatives
    Like many automated security tools, Dependency-Track may occasionally report false positives or fail to identify certain vulnerabilities (false negatives). This necessitates manual verification, which can be time-consuming and might require additional expertise.
  • Dependence on External Data Sources
    Dependency-Track relies on external vulnerability databases and data sources for its analyses (such as the National Vulnerability Database). Any inaccuracies or updates to these data sources can directly affect the accuracy of its vulnerability assessments.
  • Limited Offline Capabilities
    The tool's functionality is somewhat limited in offline environments because it needs access to external vulnerability databases for the most current information, which can restrict its usage in isolated networks or environments with strict internet usage policies.

Tenable.io videos

Introducing Tenable.io

More videos:

  • Review - Introducing Tenable.io Web Application Scanning
  • Review - Tenable Lumin Vulnerabilities Overview in Tenable.io

OWASP Dependency-Track videos

No OWASP Dependency-Track videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Tenable.io and OWASP Dependency-Track)
Monitoring Tools
100 100%
0% 0
Security
72 72%
28% 28
Code Analysis
0 0%
100% 100
Security & Privacy
100 100%
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Tenable.io and OWASP Dependency-Track. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, OWASP Dependency-Track seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 19 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Tenable.io mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Tenable.io yet. Tracking of Tenable.io recommendations started around Mar 2021.

OWASP Dependency-Track mentions (19)

  • Show HN: Pre-alpha tool for analyzing spdx SBOMs generated by GitHub
    I've become interested in SBOM recently, and found there were great tools like https://dependencytrack.org/ for CycloneDX SBOMs, but all I have is SPDX SBOMs generated by GitHub. I decided to have a go at writing my own dependency track esque tool aiming to integrate with the APIs GitHub provides. It's pretty limited in functionality so far, but can give a high level summary of the types of licenses your... - Source: Hacker News / about 1 year ago
  • SQL Injection Isn't Dead Yet
    To detect these types of vulnerabilities, we should first and foremost know our dependencies and versions, and which of them have vulnerabilities. The OWASP Top 10 2021 identifies this need as A06:2021-Vulnerable and Outdated Components. OWASP has several tools for this, including Dependency Check and Dependency Track. These tools will warn about the use of components with vulnerabilities. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • Krita fund has 0 corporate support
    Https://dependencytrack.org/ You just need to use one of the various tools out there to scan. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Friends - needs help choosing solution for SBOM vulnerability
    OWASP Dependency Track - https://dependencytrack.org/. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • software inventory of my ECS tasks
    I actually want to build the same thing you are after, and I think I’ll go for the setup you describe in idea 2. The tool you can use for this is Trivy (https://trivy.dev), have it generate a SBOM and send it to Dependencytrack (https://dependencytrack.org). Source: over 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Tenable.io and OWASP Dependency-Track, you can also consider the following products

Qualys - Qualys helps your business automate the full spectrum of auditing, compliance and protection of your IT systems and web applications.

Snyk - Snyk helps you use open source and stay secure. Continuously find and fix vulnerabilities for npm, Maven, NuGet, RubyGems, PyPI and much more.

Nessus - Nessus Professional is a security platform designed for businesses who want to protect the security of themselves, their clients, and their customers.

FOSSA - Open source license compliance and dependency analysis

BreachLock - BreachLock is a versatile platform that provides scalable and smooth penetration testing services for vulnerabilities.

WhiteSource - Find & fix security and compliance issues in open source libraries in real-time.