Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Tectonic typesetting VS Docsify.js

Compare Tectonic typesetting VS Docsify.js and see what are their differences

Tectonic typesetting logo Tectonic typesetting

A modernized, complete, standalone TeX/LaTeX engine.

Docsify.js logo Docsify.js

A magical documentation site generator.
  • Tectonic typesetting Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-11-14
  • Docsify.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-10-28

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Tectonic typesetting and Docsify.js)
Project Management
100 100%
0% 0
Documentation
0 0%
100% 100
Documentation As A Service & Tools
Knowledge Base
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Tectonic typesetting and Docsify.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Docsify.js seems to be a lot more popular than Tectonic typesetting. While we know about 17 links to Docsify.js, we've tracked only 1 mention of Tectonic typesetting. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Tectonic typesetting mentions (1)

  • bard 2.0
    v2 has improved TeX engine lookup, improved PDF template look&feel, proper support for MS Windows (where it comes integrated with the Tectonic engine) and a few more new features. Source: 12 months ago

Docsify.js mentions (17)

  • Cookbook for SH-Beginners. Any interest? (building one)
    Okay new plan, does anyone know how to do this docsify on github? I obviously am a noob on github and recently on reddit. I'd like to help where I can but my knowlegde seems to be my handycap. I could provide you a trash-mail, if you need one, but I need a PO (product owner) to manage the git... I have no clue about this yet (pages and functions and stuff). Source: 11 months ago
  • Cookbook for SH-Beginners. Any interest? (building one)
    Good idea. Instead of bookstack, I recommend something like Docsify The content is all in Markdown and can be managed in a git repo. Easy to deploy the whole website to any simple static HTTP server - or even Github pages. This way you can review contributions and have good version control. Source: 11 months ago
  • Ask HN: Any Sugestions for Proceures Documentation?
    The tools to author it aren't that important, frankly. Ask your audience what they're most comfortable using and try to meet them there. If the stakeholders are technical, you have more options. If they aren't, I hope you like Google Docs or Word, because if you give them anything other than that or a PDF, they'll probably complain. At worst, yeah, write it in a long Markdown text file and use tools like pandoc to... - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • How to Build a Personal Webpage from Scratch (In 2022)
    Big fan of https://docsify.js.org since theres no need to compile your static site. A small amount of js just renders markdown. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Example of Support Guide for End Users
    If you are searching for examples of an arbitrary Jellyfin support site, visit https://travisflix.com/help/#/support (or help.travisflix.com which redirects to the /help/ URI of the TLD) to take a look at what I have done with docsify on Github Pages. Source: over 1 year ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Tectonic typesetting and Docsify.js, you can also consider the following products

SILE - SILE is a typesetting system inspired by TeX and InDesign, but seeks to be more flexible...

GitBook - Modern Publishing, Simply taking your books from ideas to finished, polished books.

ConTeXt (Typesetting System) - ConTeXt is a typesetting system based on TeX

DocFX - A documentation generation tool for API reference and Markdown files!

pandoc - Pandoc is a Haskell library for converting from one markup format to another, and a command-line...

Doxygen - Generate documentation from source code