Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Taskcluster VS CruiseControl

Compare Taskcluster VS CruiseControl and see what are their differences

Taskcluster logo Taskcluster

Taskcluster is the task execution framework that supports Mozilla's continuous integration and...

CruiseControl logo CruiseControl

CruiseControl is both a continuous integration tool and an extensible framework for creating a...
  • Taskcluster Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-01
  • CruiseControl Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-06-29

Taskcluster features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

CruiseControl features and specs

  • Open Source
    CruiseControl is an open-source tool, which means it is freely available for use and modification, fostering community contributions and collaborations.
  • Cross-Platform Compatibility
    CruiseControl is Java-based, making it platform-independent and able to run on any operating system with a compatible JVM.
  • Extensible with Plugins
    The system supports plugins, allowing users to extend its capabilities to fit specific needs or integrate with other tools.
  • Continuous Integration Support
    CruiseControl provides robust continuous integration server capabilities, automating the build process and facilitating faster development cycles.

Possible disadvantages of CruiseControl

  • Steep Learning Curve
    Setting up CruiseControl can be complex and may require significant effort to understand and configure appropriately, especially for beginners.
  • Outdated Documentation
    The documentation may not be as up-to-date as other modern CI/CD tools, potentially leading to challenges in troubleshooting and implementation.
  • Limited Community Support
    As CruiseControl is an older project, the community around it might not be as active as it once was, leading to fewer resources and help available online.
  • Lacks Modern Features
    Compared to newer CI/CD tools, CruiseControl may lack some of the advanced features and integrations that have become standard in current software development workflows.

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Taskcluster and CruiseControl)
DevOps Tools
41 41%
59% 59
Continuous Integration
38 38%
62% 62
Continuous Deployment
49 49%
51% 51
Mobile Continuous Integration

User comments

Share your experience with using Taskcluster and CruiseControl. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Taskcluster and CruiseControl

Taskcluster Reviews

We have no reviews of Taskcluster yet.
Be the first one to post

CruiseControl Reviews

15 Best Jenkins Alternatives (Open Source & Paid) in 2021
CruiseControl is both CI tool and an extensible framework. It is used for building a custom continuous build process. This alternative to Jenkins has many plugins for a variety of source controls, build technologies which include email and instant messaging.
Source: www.guru99.com
The Best Alternatives to Jenkins for Developers
CruiseControl is a continuous integration tool, and it provides a framework that can be extended to create customized build processes. Though written in Java, it can be used in different projects with the help of builders provided by it. It can integrate with different source control systems.

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Taskcluster and CruiseControl, you can also consider the following products

Buildbot - Python-based continuous integration testing framework

Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development

Screwdriver - Yahoo's Continuous Delivery Build System for Dynamic Infrastructure

CircleCI - CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.

CruiseControl.rb - CruiseControl.rb is a continuous integration tool.

Travis CI - Simple, flexible, trustworthy CI/CD tools. Join hundreds of thousands who define tests and deployments in minutes, then scale up simply with parallel or multi-environment builds using Travis CI’s precision syntax—all with the developer in mind.