Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Take Command VS BusyBox

Compare Take Command VS BusyBox and see what are their differences

Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Take Command logo Take Command

The most powerful Windows console command line tools and batch scripting solution available.

BusyBox logo BusyBox

BusyBox is a single binary that provides several stripped-down Unix tools in a single executable.
  • Take Command Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-07-31
  • BusyBox Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-04-14

Take Command features and specs

  • Enhanced Command Line Interface
    Take Command provides a more powerful and user-friendly command line interface compared to the default Command Prompt, featuring tabbed windows, extensive customization options, and additional functionality.
  • Batch File Development
    The software includes advanced batch file programming tools, which make it easier to create and debug complex scripts, enhancing productivity for power users and developers.
  • Scripting Language Support
    Take Command supports multiple scripting languages, allowing users to execute and manage scripts in languages like REXX, Perl, and Python, in addition to traditional batch scripting.
  • Integrated File Explorer
    It includes an integrated file explorer that allows users to navigate and manage files more easily within the same interface, improving workflow and efficiency.
  • Tabbed Interface
    The ability to open multiple tabbed command line windows helps users keep their tasks organized and allows simultaneous operations and easy switching between tasks.

Possible disadvantages of Take Command

  • Learning Curve
    While powerful, the extensive feature set and capabilities of Take Command can result in a steep learning curve for new users who are accustomed to the traditional Command Prompt or other command-line tools.
  • Cost
    Take Command is a paid software, which can be a barrier for users or companies with limited budgets, especially since there are free alternatives for command line enhancements.
  • Overhead
    Compared to using the standard Command Prompt, Take Command may have a higher resource overhead, which could impact performance on less powerful machines.
  • Compatibility
    Some command or scripting functions may not be fully compatible with scripts written for other environments, which could require modifications to existing scripts.
  • Limited Platform Support
    Take Command is primarily designed for Windows, limiting its utility for users who need a cross-platform solution that works seamlessly across different operating systems such as macOS or Linux.

BusyBox features and specs

  • Lightweight
    BusyBox is designed to be a minimalistic utility that combines tiny versions of many common UNIX utilities into a single small executable, making it ideal for systems with limited resources.
  • All-in-One
    It provides a comprehensive suite of tools and utilities in one package, eliminating the need to install and manage multiple separate utilities.
  • Customizable
    BusyBox can be customized to include only the needed utilities, which allows for a tailored solution that fits the specific requirements of a project or system.
  • Open Source
    It is open source, meaning it is freely available for anyone to use, modify, and distribute, which encourages collaboration and community-driven improvements.
  • Widely Used in Embedded Systems
    BusyBox is popular in embedded systems and other environments where storage and processing power are limited, making it a proven choice for resource-constrained applications.

Possible disadvantages of BusyBox

  • Limited Functionality
    Being a smaller version of each utility, BusyBox may lack some of the advanced features found in full versions of UNIX utilities, which can be a limitation for complex tasks.
  • Compatibility Issues
    Certain scripts or applications that expect specific behaviors from standard Linux utilities might not work correctly with BusyBox due to subtle differences in functionality.
  • Less Frequent Updates
    Compared to mainstream distributions and their utilities, BusyBox might not be updated as frequently, which can be a concern for security or feature updates.
  • Steeper Learning Curve for Customization
    Customizing BusyBox to include or exclude specific utilities can require a more in-depth understanding of both the system’s needs and the configuration options available.

Take Command videos

+ Add

Battle of Second Manassas - Take Command - Review

More videos:

  • Review - [X-Plane] Take Command | Hot Start TBM 900 | First Look & Review

BusyBox videos

+ Add

What is BusyBox | Busybox demo

More videos:

  • Review - What Is Busybox and Why do we need it for Android?

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Take Command and BusyBox)

Take Command

BusyBox

SSH
60 60%
SSH
40% 40
Terminal Tools
33 33%
Terminal Tools
67% 67
Server Management
60 60%
Server Management
40% 40
OS & Utilities
100 100%
OS & Utilities
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Take Command and BusyBox. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Take Command and BusyBox

Take Command Reviews

We have no reviews of Take Command yet.
Be the first one to post

BusyBox Reviews

Top 10 Best Apps To Use Linux Terminal on Your Android Device
BusyBox is an excellent option for Android users who want to have control in the internal Linux command-line shell. This terminal emulator for Android requires a rooted device to function properly. It is one of the most popular among its competitors. There is a pro version, but the vanilla edition is more than enough for casual users. It will provide you with numerous Unix...
Source: www.ubuntupit.com
Best Terminal Emulator for Android in 2021
BusyBox is a famous terminal emulator for quick and reliable performance. It needs the device to be rooted for executing the app. The emulator can work well with Linux kernel with GNU Core applications. It offers plenty of standard Unix tools with backup features to retrieve all data. The app provides the user to choose the desired applets for quick installation. It also...
Source: www.techowns.com

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, BusyBox seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 17 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Take Command mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Take Command yet. Tracking of Take Command recommendations started around Mar 2021.

BusyBox mentions (17)

  • Revisit base container image for AWS services
    The busybox container is, as the name suggests, a base image that contains the minimum environment for BusyBox to work. It is also one of the official Docker images. The actual Dockerfile for creating this image is as follows:. - Source: dev.to / 4 months ago
  • Making memcpy(NULL, NULL, 0) well-defined
    Https://busybox.net/~landley/c99-draft.html#7.20.6.1 "The abs, labs, and llabs functions compute the absolute value of an integer j. If the result cannot be represented, the behavior is undefined. (242)" 242 The absolute value of the most negative number cannot be represented in two's complement. - Source: Hacker News / 6 months ago
  • Docker, Linux, Security. Kinda.
    On to our second point, which is the cli utilities' implementation. Debian and Ubuntu use gnu's Coreutils while Alpine uses Busybox(remember, we are talking about the most used application container bases. You can install a desktop version of Alpine with GNU coreutils). Here we have the same situation as before, The GNU coreutils are bigger, do more and have a larger attack surface. Busybox is smaller, does not... - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • The Awk Programming Language, Second Edition
    AWK runs everywhere. Perl and Python do not. Busybox has their own independent AWK implementation. https://busybox.net/ https://frippery.org/busybox/ Also see the first edition of the AWK manual online here: https://archive.org/details/pdfy-MgN0H1joIoDVoIC7. - Source: Hacker News / almost 2 years ago
  • This would have made my life so much easier in the beginning....
    A majority of routers are already based on the Linux kernel. Many are just BusyBox. The most common Linux firewalls are iptables and nftables. With the latter being the most popular one due to being around longer. They are really fine grained and powerful. Source: about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Take Command and BusyBox, you can also consider the following products

Console2 - Console2 is a modern Windows terminal that features different profiles and color schemes, running as a system service and with support for VIP profiles.

Termux - Terminal emulator and Linux environment for Android

yeahconsole - YeahConsole turns an xterm into a gamelike console.

GNU Core Utilities - The GNU Core Utilities or coreutils is a package of GNU software containing many of the basic...

superconsole - SuperConsole is a software collection based on ConEmu, MSYS2, Mintty, Zsh, Git for Windows, grml-zsh-config, Antigen and agkozak-zsh-theme projects, customized and configured for everyday use.

Toybox (Linux command line utilities) - Toybox combines common Linux command line utilities together into a single BSD-licensed executable...

Loading...