Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

surge.sh VS NLP.js

Compare surge.sh VS NLP.js and see what are their differences

Note: These products don't have any matching categories. If you think this is a mistake, please edit the details of one of the products and suggest appropriate categories.

surge.sh logo surge.sh

Static website hosting for front-end developers.

NLP.js logo NLP.js

An NLP library for building bots, with entity extraction, sentiment analysis, automatic language identify, and so more - axa-group/nlp.js
  • surge.sh Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-20
  • NLP.js Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-08-02

surge.sh features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Surge.sh offers a simple and intuitive interface for developers to deploy static websites quickly with a minimal learning curve.
  • Free Tier
    It provides a generous free tier, allowing developers to deploy sites without cost, which is beneficial for hobby projects or initial development stages.
  • Custom Domain
    Surge.sh supports custom domains, giving users the ability to deploy their site under a personalized web address easily.
  • Instant Deployment
    Deployments on Surge.sh are incredibly fast, often taking just seconds, which enhances productivity and reduces downtime.
  • HTTPS Support
    It includes built-in HTTPS support, ensuring that sites are secure without the need for manual SSL certificate management.

Possible disadvantages of surge.sh

  • Static Sites Only
    Surge.sh is designed specifically for static sites, so it does not support server-side logic, databases, or back-end functionality.
  • Limited Configuration Options
    It offers fewer customization options compared to other more complex deployment services, potentially limiting flexibility for advanced use cases.
  • File Size Limits
    There are file size and total site size limitations, which could be restrictive for large projects or media-heavy websites.
  • No Built-in CI/CD
    Surge.sh lacks integrated continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) workflows, which are available in other services like Netlify and Vercel.
  • Dependency on Third-Party Services for Enhancements
    For added features like backend services, developers will need to integrate third-party services, which could complicate the deployment architecture.

NLP.js features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

surge.sh videos

Introducing Surge

NLP.js videos

No NLP.js videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to surge.sh and NLP.js)
Static Site Generators
100 100%
0% 0
Spreadsheets
0 0%
100% 100
Website Builder
100 100%
0% 0
Natural Language Processing

User comments

Share your experience with using surge.sh and NLP.js. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, surge.sh should be more popular than NLP.js. It has been mentiond 26 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

surge.sh mentions (26)

View more

NLP.js mentions (8)

  • Natural Language Processing (NLP) in JavaScript (series 2)
    We'll use the "natural" NLP library; follow the previous session to understand how to set up your environment. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • Natural Language Processing (NLP) in JavaScript (series)
    Several NLP libraries are available, each offering distinct features and functionalities. One popular choice in the JavaScript ecosystem is the Natural Language Toolkit for JavaScript (NLP.js), which provides a wide range of NLP capabilities. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • [AskJS] Rate a string on how much sense it makes
    For a JS based approach you could try NLP libraries like this one: https://github.com/axa-group/nlp.js. Source: about 2 years ago
  • The full tech stack to run a chatbot — behind the scenes of an open source bot platform
    To determine which chatbot intent is the best match for the user textual input, we rely on nlp.js (in JS) though we are in the process of moving to our new Python NLP server for better optimization of the needs of eCommerce conversations. A preprocessor language model is also used to improve the chances of a matching. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
  • How to build your own chatbot NLP engine
    Probably not. In fact, in Xatkit we aim to be a chatbot orchestration platform exactly to avoid reinventing the wheel and the non-invented here syndrome. So, in most cases, other existing platform (like DialogFlow or nlp.js) will work just fine. But we have also realized that there are always some particularly tricky bots for which you really need to be able to customize your engine to the specific chatbot... - Source: dev.to / about 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing surge.sh and NLP.js, you can also consider the following products

GitHub Pages - A free, static web host for open-source projects on GitHub

NLTK - NLTK is a platform for building Python programs to work with human language data.

tiiny.host - The simplest way to share your web project.

FuzzyWuzzy - FuzzyWuzzy is a Fuzzy String Matching in Python that uses Levenshtein Distance to calculate the differences between sequences.

Vercel - Vercel is the platform for frontend developers, providing the speed and reliability innovators need to create at the moment of inspiration.

Amazon Comprehend - Discover insights and relationships in text