Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

surge.sh VS Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL

Compare surge.sh VS Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL and see what are their differences

surge.sh logo surge.sh

Static website hosting for front-end developers.

Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL logo Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL

PostgreSQL as a Service
  • surge.sh Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-20
  • Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-10-29

surge.sh features and specs

  • Ease of Use
    Surge.sh offers a simple and intuitive interface for developers to deploy static websites quickly with a minimal learning curve.
  • Free Tier
    It provides a generous free tier, allowing developers to deploy sites without cost, which is beneficial for hobby projects or initial development stages.
  • Custom Domain
    Surge.sh supports custom domains, giving users the ability to deploy their site under a personalized web address easily.
  • Instant Deployment
    Deployments on Surge.sh are incredibly fast, often taking just seconds, which enhances productivity and reduces downtime.
  • HTTPS Support
    It includes built-in HTTPS support, ensuring that sites are secure without the need for manual SSL certificate management.

Possible disadvantages of surge.sh

  • Static Sites Only
    Surge.sh is designed specifically for static sites, so it does not support server-side logic, databases, or back-end functionality.
  • Limited Configuration Options
    It offers fewer customization options compared to other more complex deployment services, potentially limiting flexibility for advanced use cases.
  • File Size Limits
    There are file size and total site size limitations, which could be restrictive for large projects or media-heavy websites.
  • No Built-in CI/CD
    Surge.sh lacks integrated continuous integration and continuous deployment (CI/CD) workflows, which are available in other services like Netlify and Vercel.
  • Dependency on Third-Party Services for Enhancements
    For added features like backend services, developers will need to integrate third-party services, which could complicate the deployment architecture.

Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL features and specs

  • Managed Service
    Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL is a fully managed service, meaning that AWS handles routine database tasks such as backups, patch management, and failover, reducing the operational burden on users.
  • Scalability
    The service allows for easy vertically scaling of database instances as application demands grow, without requiring downtime. This helps businesses to adapt to changing workloads efficiently.
  • High Availability
    With Multi-AZ deployments, Amazon RDS provides enhanced reliability and availability. It automatically creates a primary database instance and synchronously replicates data to a standby instance in a different Availability Zone.
  • Security Features
    Amazon RDS integrates with AWS Identity and Access Management (IAM) for access control and offers encryption at rest and in transit capabilities, bolstering data security.
  • Backup and Recovery
    Automatic backups, snapshots, and point-in-time recovery simplify data recovery and help ensure that data can be restored to any given second during the retention period.

Possible disadvantages of Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL

  • Cost
    The cost of running a managed service like Amazon RDS can be higher than managing a database in-house, especially for smaller organizations or when optimal configurations are not utilized.
  • Limited Customization
    Since Amazon RDS is a managed service, there are certain limitations on access to the underlying operating system and database configurations, which may hinder some advanced customizations and optimizations.
  • Vendor Lock-In
    Using RDS for PostgreSQL can lead to vendor lock-in, making it difficult for businesses to move away from AWS without incurring data transfer costs or requiring significant re-engineering efforts.
  • Maintenance Windows
    Updates and patches are applied during scheduled maintenance windows, which might cause disruptions if the timing is not properly managed or if unexpected performance issues occur during these periods.
  • Limited Extension Support
    While RDS for PostgreSQL supports a wide range of extensions, not all PostgreSQL extensions are available, potentially limiting additional functionality that might be needed for specialized use cases.

surge.sh videos

Introducing Surge

Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL videos

Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL/Amazon Aurora PostgreSQL Operational Best Practices | AWS Events

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to surge.sh and Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL)
Static Site Generators
100 100%
0% 0
Databases
0 0%
100% 100
Cloud Computing
89 89%
11% 11
Cloud Hosting
0 0%
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using surge.sh and Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, surge.sh should be more popular than Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL. It has been mentiond 26 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

surge.sh mentions (26)

View more

Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL mentions (16)

  • Kubernetes and Container Portability: Navigating Multi-Cloud Flexibility
    Amazon RDS for MySQL (for managed MySQL) or Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL (for managed PostgreSQL). - Source: dev.to / about 2 months ago
  • Top 8 Managed Postgres Providers
    Amazon RDS is a managed service for relational databases that makes PostgreSQL setup, scaling, and management automatic. This lets developers concentrate on creating applications instead of handling database tasks. - Source: dev.to / 10 months ago
  • Deploying Django Application on AWS with Terraform - Part 1
    Yay! We have now deployed our Django web application with ECS Service + Fargate on AWS. But now it works with SQLite file database. This file will be recreated on every service restart. So, our app cannot persist any data for now. In the next article we’ll connect Django to AWS RDS PostgreSQL. - Source: dev.to / about 1 year ago
  • gactive: Active-active Replication Extension for PostgreSQL on Amazon RDS
    Today, AWS announces the general availability of pgactive: Active-active Replication Extension for PostgreSQL, available for Amazon Relational Database Service (RDS) for PostgreSQL. Pgactive lets you use asynchronous active-active replication for streaming data between database instances to provide additional resiliency and flexibility in moving data between database instances, including writers located in... Source: over 1 year ago
  • Hosting my Software
    Best practice would definitely be setting up a separately hosted database (I swear I'm not an AWS shill) for production as this ensures much better data integrity. Plus it manages backups etc. For you. Source: about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing surge.sh and Amazon RDS for PostgreSQL, you can also consider the following products

GitHub Pages - A free, static web host for open-source projects on GitHub

Application Load Balance - Automatically distribute incoming traffic across multiple targets using an Application Load Balancer.

tiiny.host - The simplest way to share your web project.

Amazon S3 - Amazon S3 is an object storage where users can store data from their business on a safe, cloud-based platform. Amazon S3 operates in 54 availability zones within 18 graphic regions and 1 local region.

Vercel - Vercel is the platform for frontend developers, providing the speed and reliability innovators need to create at the moment of inspiration.

Amazon Aurora - MySQL and PostgreSQL-compatible relational database built for the cloud. Performance and availability of commercial-grade databases at 1/10th the cost.