Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups

Structr VS Stantive OrchestraCMS

Compare Structr VS Stantive OrchestraCMS and see what are their differences

Structr logo Structr

Open-source data CMS platform.

Stantive OrchestraCMS logo Stantive OrchestraCMS

Stantive’s OrchestraCMS is the only content and digital experience platform (DXP) built 100% native on Salesforce.
  • Structr Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-12-27
  • Stantive OrchestraCMS Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-01-18

Structr features and specs

  • Full-Stack Solution
    Structr offers a cohesive full-stack solution, combining back-end and front-end capabilities into one package, which can simplify development and maintenance.
  • Graph Database Integration
    Structr is built on top of Neo4j, a leading graph database, allowing users to leverage graph data models and operations effectively.
  • Rapid Development
    With its low-code environment, Structr enables faster application development and prototyping, reducing time-to-market.
  • User-Friendly Interface
    The platform provides a user-friendly interface that helps both developers and non-developers to design and manage applications without deep technical knowledge.
  • Flexibility
    Structr's customizable architecture supports diverse use cases and can be tailored to fit specific project requirements.

Possible disadvantages of Structr

  • Learning Curve
    While Structr offers extensive features, new users might face a significant learning curve before mastering its full potential.
  • Limited Community Support
    Compared to other development platforms, Structr has a smaller community, potentially leading to less community-based support and fewer third-party resources.
  • Dependency on Neo4j
    As Structr heavily relies on Neo4j, users must also have an understanding of Neo4j, which may require extra learning and adaptation.
  • Performance Constraints
    For very large and complex data sets, performance might be a concern, as graph databases like Neo4j can have limitations compared to traditional databases in certain scenarios.
  • Cost
    While there might be open-source components, additional features or enterprise-level solutions in Structr may involve licensing fees or additional costs.

Stantive OrchestraCMS features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Structr videos

Short intro demo video of Structr (6:23)

Stantive OrchestraCMS videos

No Stantive OrchestraCMS videos yet. You could help us improve this page by suggesting one.

Add video

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Structr and Stantive OrchestraCMS)
Project Management
77 77%
23% 23
Cloud Storage
67 67%
33% 33
Document Collaboration
74 74%
26% 26
Office & Productivity
66 66%
34% 34

User comments

Share your experience with using Structr and Stantive OrchestraCMS. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Structr and Stantive OrchestraCMS, you can also consider the following products

Acquia - Acquia is a commercial open-source software that provides products, services and technical support for the open source Drupal social publishing system.

Adobe Experience Manager - Adobe Experience Manager is a cross-platform CMS that works across websites, mobile apps and on-site displays.

Ideagen Easysite - Ideagen Easysite is secure, user-friendly and reliable web and enterprise content management system software.

Seismic - Seismic is the leading global sales and marketing enablement solution, improving close rates and delivering larger deals for sales while increasing marketing’s impact on the bottom line.

DocuShare by Xerox - DocuShare is a content management system developed by Xerox.

OnBase - OnBase is an enterprise content management and process management software suite.