Software Alternatives & Reviews
Register | Login

Stonebranch VS Chef

Compare Stonebranch VS Chef and see what are their differences

Unimus
Unimus is a Network Automation and Configuration management (NCM) solution designed for fast deployment network-wide and ease of use. Unimus does not require learning any abstraction or templating languages, and does not require any coding skills. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Stonebranch logo Stonebranch

Stonebranch builds IT orchestration and automation solutions that transform business IT environments from simple IT task automation into sophisticated, real-time business service automation.

Chef logo Chef

Automation for all of your technology. Overcome the complexity and rapidly ship your infrastructure and apps anywhere with automation.
  • Stonebranch Landing Page
    Landing Page //
    2024-01-22
  • Stonebranch Drag-and-Drop Workflow
    Drag-and-Drop Workflow //
    2024-01-22
  • Stonebranch Integrated Dashboard
    Integrated Dashboard //
    2024-01-22

No matter the degree of automation, the Stonebranch platform is simple, modern, and secure. Using the Stonebranch Universal Automation Center, enterprises can seamlessly orchestrate workloads and data across technology ecosystems and silos. Headquartered in Atlanta, Georgia, with points of contact and support across the globe Stonebranch serves some of the world's largest financial, manufacturing, healthcare, travel, transportation, energy, and technology institutions. Learn more: www.stonebranch.com

  • Chef Landing page
    Landing page //
    2023-10-19

Stonebranch features and specs

  • Workload Automation: Job scheduling and Workload Automation capabilities that support on-prem, cloud and containerized microservices in a hybrid IT enviornment.
  • Data Pipeline Orchestration: Simplify the management of your data pipeline with a centralized orchestration solution built to keep data moving—so that insights are delivered to the business without error.
  • Cloud Automation: Centralize the management of automated workloads across private cloud, public cloud, and multi-cloud environment.
  • Managed File Transfer: Move data between any type of cloud, on-prem or containerized system.
  • DevOps and DataOps Enabled: Support dev, test, prod processes within the platorm, or by connecting to third party repositories like GitHub.
  • SaaS: Deployment options include both SaaS and on-premises.

Chef features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Stonebranch videos

+ Add

Stonebranch's Service Orchestration and Automation Platform (SOAP)

More videos:

  • Review - About the Stonebranch Universal Automation Center Platform

Chef videos

+ Add

Chef - Movie Review

More videos:

  • Review - Pro Chef Breaks Down Cooking Scenes from Movies | GQ
  • Review - Pro Chefs Review Restaurant Scenes In Movies | Test Kitchen Talks | Bon Appétit

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Stonebranch and Chef)

Stonebranch

Chef

IT Automation
100 100%
IT Automation
0% 0
DevOps Tools
0 0%
DevOps Tools
100% 100
Workflow Automation
100 100%
Workflow Automation
0% 0
Continuous Integration
0 0%
Continuous Integration
100% 100

User comments

Share your experience with using Stonebranch and Chef. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Reviews

These are some of the external sources and on-site user reviews we've used to compare Stonebranch and Chef

Stonebranch Reviews

Top 10 Control-M Alternatives in ’23
However, choosing a workload automation solution that fits your business goals and objectives in a complex market landscape can be challenging. For instance, Control-M is one of the WLA market leaders along with ActiveBatch, Redwood RunMyJobs, Stonebranch Universal Automation Center (UAC) and JAMS WLA according to AIMultiple’s analysis based on 7 different data sources.
Source: research.aimultiple.com
9 Control-M Alternatives & Competitors In 2023
Stonebranch helps organizations of any size scale and complexity scale up or down as needed. In addition to providing scalable IT automation, Stonebranch simplifies complex IT environments with its platform-agnostic, cloud-based architecture. Customers can benefit from a smoother transition to the cloud without sacrificing security, flexibility, or data security. Regardless...
Source: www.softwaretestingmaterial.com
The Top 5 BMC Control-M API Alternatives
With Stonebranch, organizations can centrally manage and automate complex business processes across on-premises, cloud, and hybrid environments. UAC is designed to simplify IT automation and make it more accessible to business users while still providing advanced features for IT operations teams.
Source: www.redwood.com

Chef Reviews

5 Best DevSecOps Tools in 2023
There are multiple providers for Infrastructure as Code such as AWS CloudFormation, RedHat Ansible, HashiCorp Terraform, Puppet, Chef, and others. It is advised to research each to determine what is best for any given situation since each has pros and cons. Some of these also are not completely free while others are. There are also some that are specific to a particular...
Source: devopsauthority.tech
Best 8 Ansible Alternatives & equivalent in 2022
Chef is a useful DevOps tool for achieving speed, scale, and consistency. It is a Cloud based system. It can be used to ease out complex tasks and perform automation.
Source: www.guru99.com
Top 5 Ansible Alternatives in 2022: Server Automation Solutions by Alexander Fashakin on the 19th Aug 2021 facebook Linked In Twitter
Chef makes it easier to manage and configure your servers. With Chef, you can integrate services such as Amazon’s EC2, Microsoft Azure, or Google Cloud Platform to automatically provision and configure new machines. It enables all components of an IT infrastructure to be connected and facilitates adding new elements without manual intervention.
Source: www.servertribe.com
Ansible vs Chef: What’s the Difference?
So, which of these are better? In reality, it depends on what your organization needs. Chef has been around longer and is great for handling extremely complex tasks. Ansible is easier to install and use, and therefore is more limited in how difficult the tasks can be. It’s just a matter of understanding what’s important for your business, and that goes beyond a simply...
Source: www.simplilearn.com
Chef vs Puppet vs Ansible
Chef follows the cue of Puppet in this section of the Chef vs Puppet vs ansible debate. How? The master-slave architecture of Chef implies running the Chef server on the master machine and running the Chef clients as agents on different client machines. Apart from these similarities with Puppet, Chef also has an additional component in its architecture, the workstation. The...
Source: www.whizlabs.com

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Stonebranch and Chef, you can also consider the following products

ActiveBatch - Orchestrate the entire tech stack with ActiveBatch Workload Automation & Job Scheduling. Build and manage workflows from one place.

Ansible - Radically simple configuration-management, application deployment, task-execution, and multi-node orchestration engine

Control-M - Control‑M simplifies and automates diverse batch application workloads while reducing failure rates, improving SLAs, and accelerating application deployment.

Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development

GoAnywhere MFT - GoAnywhere is a managed file transfer (MFT) solution that secures and automates the exchange of data. GoAnywhere's interface and workflow features eliminate the need for custom programs, scripts, single-function tools or other manual methods.

Puppet Enterprise - Get started with Puppet Enterprise, or upgrade or expand.

Loading...