Software Alternatives, Accelerators & Startups
Register | Login

Step in Time VS Buildbot

Compare Step in Time VS Buildbot and see what are their differences

PlexTrac
PlexTrac is the #1 AI-powered platform for pentest reporting and threat exposure management, helping cybersecurity teams efficiently address the most critical threats and vulnerabilities. featured
Contents:
  1. » Base Details
  2. » Videos
  3. » Reviews
  4. » Alternatives

Step in Time logo Step in Time

A music player app for rehearsals

Buildbot logo Buildbot

Python-based continuous integration testing framework
  • Step in Time Landing page
    Landing page //
    2020-01-14
  • Buildbot Landing page
    Landing page //
    2021-09-21

Step in Time features and specs

No features have been listed yet.

Buildbot features and specs

  • Flexibility
    Buildbot supports a wide range of configurations and is highly adaptable to different environments and workflows.
  • Scalability
    It can handle multiple build processes simultaneously, making it suitable for large-scale continuous integration setups.
  • Open Source
    As an open-source project, Buildbot is free to use and has a community that can contribute to its development and maintenance.
  • Customizability
    The system allows for extensive customization through Python scripts, enabling users to tailor it to their specific needs.
  • Extensive Documentation
    Buildbot has thorough documentation that helps new users get started and allows advanced users to dive into more complex configurations.

Possible disadvantages of Buildbot

  • Steep Learning Curve
    Due to its flexibility and customization options, new users may find it challenging to set up and configure Buildbot initially.
  • Limited UI
    The user interface is not as polished or user-friendly as some other continuous integration tools, which can impact usability.
  • Dependency Management
    Managing dependencies can be cumbersome, particularly when incorporating different environments and complex workflows.
  • Performance Overhead
    The system can become resource-intensive, particularly with larger and more complex build environments, potentially leading to increased performance overhead.
  • Community Size
    The community, while active, is not as large as some other CI/CD tools, which might limit available support and third-party integrations.

Analysis of Buildbot

Overall verdict

  • Buildbot is a powerful and flexible option for those who need a customizable and robust continuous integration and delivery system. However, its complexity and learning curve may not make it the best choice for smaller teams or projects that require a simpler, out-of-the-box solution.

Why this product is good

  • Buildbot is an open-source framework designed to automate software build, test, and release processes. It is highly customizable and extensible, which makes it suitable for complex and large-scale CI/CD pipelines. It supports a wide range of programming languages and tools, and its flexibility allows it to be tailored to specific project needs. Additionally, since Buildbot is open-source, it benefits from community contributions and support.

Recommended for

    Buildbot is recommended for experienced developers and DevOps teams who require a highly customizable continuous integration/continuous delivery system, particularly in environments where complex and large-scale operations are needed. It is ideal for projects that require unique workflows or integrations that are not supported by more mainstream CI/CD solutions.

Step in Time videos

+ Add

Step In Time Dance Review

More videos:

  • Review - Step in Time Group 2 Vocal Review
  • Review - Step in Time Sweeps Vocal Review

Buildbot videos

+ Add

Craig Rodrigues - Migrating Python.org to Buildbot 9 and Python 3 - SF Python Meetup

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to Step in Time and Buildbot)

Step in Time

Buildbot

Continuous Integration
10 10%
Continuous Integration
90% 90
DevOps Tools
11 11%
DevOps Tools
89% 89
Continuous Deployment
8 8%
Continuous Deployment
92% 92
Security & Privacy
100 100%
Security & Privacy
0% 0

User comments

Share your experience with using Step in Time and Buildbot. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Buildbot seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 9 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

Step in Time mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of Step in Time yet. Tracking of Step in Time recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Buildbot mentions (9)

  • 10 open source tools that platform, SRE and DevOps engineers should consider in 2024.
    Buildbot is a versatile CI framework designed to automate all aspects of the software development cycle, enhancing efficiency and reliability. As an open-source platform, it is highly customizable, allowing teams to tailor the automation process to their specific needs. Buildbot excels in integrating various stages of development, from code integration, testing, to deployment, ensuring a seamless and coherent... - Source: dev.to / over 1 year ago
  • Continuos Integration and C++
    If you want more than the builtin CIs in Github and Gitlab, https://buildbot.net is the way. Source: about 2 years ago
  • What are the open source CI/CD tools for C++ (comparable to Ansible, Jenkins, etc.)?
    If you don't have one already integrated with your source control, buildbot is pretty nice and doesn't force you to use docker like most others. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Why Jenkins?
    Https://buildbot.net/ existed before Jenkins Hudson and was quite well known. Source: over 2 years ago
  • Which is the best CI/CD self-hosted open source tool?
    I have used python based CI tool buildbot which is a great tool but we want to move away from buildbot only because in some scenarios we want to compile low-level microseconds which are in c++ to a different architecture. Buildbot doesn't have such a feature. - Source: dev.to / almost 3 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing Step in Time and Buildbot, you can also consider the following products

Concourse - Pipeline-based CI system written in Go

Jenkins - Jenkins is an open-source continuous integration server with 300+ plugins to support all kinds of software development

Screwdriver - Yahoo's Continuous Delivery Build System for Dynamic Infrastructure

Travis CI - Simple, flexible, trustworthy CI/CD tools. Join hundreds of thousands who define tests and deployments in minutes, then scale up simply with parallel or multi-environment builds using Travis CI’s precision syntax—all with the developer in mind.

Prevalent ThirdParty Risk Management - Prevalent ThirdParty Risk Management is an online service that offers cyber-attack security risk management for your company.

CircleCI - CircleCI gives web developers powerful Continuous Integration and Deployment with easy setup and maintenance.

Loading...