Software Alternatives & Reviews

stealjs VS Buck

Compare stealjs VS Buck and see what are their differences

stealjs logo stealjs

Futuristic JavaScript dependency loader and builder. Speeds up application load times. Works with ES6, CommonJS, AMD, CSS, LESS and more. Simplifies modular workflows.

Buck logo Buck

A high-performance build tool for Android by Facebook
  • stealjs Landing page
    Landing page //
    2019-12-25
  • Buck Landing page
    Landing page //
    2022-03-29

stealjs videos

StealJS Overview

More videos:

  • Review - Getting Started With StealJS and ES6
  • Review - Easy ES6 with StealJS

Buck videos

Buck HONEST Operator Review | Rainbow Six Siege

More videos:

  • Review - Unbreakable Pocket Knife Destruction Test - Buck 110 review
  • Review - Buck 110 review after carrying for 9 years

Category Popularity

0-100% (relative to stealjs and Buck)
Web Application Bundler
100 100%
0% 0
Front End Package Manager
JS Build Tools
50 50%
50% 50
Development
45 45%
55% 55

User comments

Share your experience with using stealjs and Buck. For example, how are they different and which one is better?
Log in or Post with

Social recommendations and mentions

Based on our record, Buck seems to be more popular. It has been mentiond 8 times since March 2021. We are tracking product recommendations and mentions on various public social media platforms and blogs. They can help you identify which product is more popular and what people think of it.

stealjs mentions (0)

We have not tracked any mentions of stealjs yet. Tracking of stealjs recommendations started around Mar 2021.

Buck mentions (8)

  • Compiling a single-file app with csc.dll
    We use Buck company wide. Our packaging / deployment system, for example, expects to be given a Buck target to build, not a pre-built binary - I can’t just build my app with dotnet and upload it. While it is possible for a Buck target to be a simple bash command (i.e dotnet publish), doing so makes the target “opaque” - Buck wouldn’t have any knowledge of my app’s build graph so I’d lose many of the benefits it... Source: 11 months ago
  • Just: A Command Runner
    Oh excellent, then better (and more portable!) tools are available: http://pants.build https://ninja-build.org https://buck.build and, if you hate yourself: https://bazel.build. - Source: Hacker News / over 1 year ago
  • Dev Discussions: Everything You Need to Know about Monorepos with Juri Strumpflohner of Nrwl
    Pioneered by tech giants like Google and Meta with tools like Bazel and Buck, monorepos are seeing widespread adoption across companies of all sizes and industries. - Source: dev.to / almost 2 years ago
  • Using URLs for dependency management
    Buck has a http_file() that you can use this way, and it has first-class support for Java. Source: almost 2 years ago
  • Is it possible to be an android developer ONLY with the documentation?
    That's a good bridge into saying that we don't use pretty much any standard tooling. Our build system is Buck, we use Mercurial instead of Git, and the IDE of choice seems to be Visual Studio (although Android Studio is supported, with some custom plugins required). Source: about 2 years ago
View more

What are some alternatives?

When comparing stealjs and Buck, you can also consider the following products

RequireJS - RequireJS is a JavaScript file and module loader.

GNU Make - GNU Make is a tool which controls the generation of executables and other non-source files of a program from the program's source files.

Webpack - Webpack is a module bundler. Its main purpose is to bundle JavaScript files for usage in a browser, yet it is also capable of transforming, bundling, or packaging just about any resource or asset.

SCons - SCons is an Open Source software construction tool—that is, a next-generation build tool.

npm - npm is a package manager for Node.

Ninja Build - Ninja is a small build system with a focus on speed.